The story about the killing of the US Ambassador in Benghazi is shrouded in mystery indeed. Reportedly, President Obama knew about the plans to attack the embassy in Benghazi. Obama was informed about the need to conduct the rescue operation, but the president decided not to hold it for unknown reasons. The CIA Director, the US Secretary of State, one admiral and eight generals resigned six months afterwards. Obviously, President Obama was aware of what was happening in the embassy, but decided not to conduct a special operation to save the lives of US citizens working there. Some time later, Hillary Clinton delivered a speech before Congress in late January of 2013, then she fell ill and resigned after the election.
Afterwards, Hillary Clinton was summoned to appear at Congress hearings. However, she did not come, having claimed that she had suffered a concussion when she fell due to flu-caused dehydration. Some time later, though, Clinton came up with a more "compelling" reason not to go to the hearing - a blood clot.
It is obvious that such conduct was not an attempt to avoid the consequences of "errors in policy" that consisted in the support of the Libyan rebels who committed the attack. The actual cause of such behavior was more sinister. Namely, the murder of US Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi was committed by the State Department. Moreover, the murder was an integral part of the policy of the Department of State. Hillary Clinton would have killed Stevens anyway.
Christopher Stevens was killed because he criticized the policies of the Obama administration, particularly Hillary Clinton, in the Middle East. The ambassador condemned the US strategy of state terrorism supported by organized crime groups, which the State Department calls either "freedom fighters" or "terrorists" depending on the political situation. - See more at: http://www.pravdareport.com/hotspots/crimes/29-06-2016/134864-stevens_benghazi_clinton-0/#sthash.EZTL1VYT.dpuf
Christopher Stevens murder in Benghazi: Killed by Hillary Clinton
29.06.2016
US authorities took no adequate measures in connection with the attack on the CIA base, a US diplomatic mission, in the Libyan city of Benghazi, a report from a special committee of the US Congress House of Representatives said.
Chairman of the committee that prepared the report, Trey Gowdy, said that the US government had taken no measures even eight hours after the Islamic radicals attacked US premises in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, RT reports.
Republicans initiated the investigation into the circumstances of the attack on the CIA base in Benghazi in 2014. According to them, the Democrats in the White House were concealing the information on the case. Despite the sharp criticism of the US administration, the report contains no challenges against Hillary Clinton, who served as the US Secretary of State at the time.
According to The New York Times, many months of investigation could not find any evidence of the involvement of either Al Qaeda or other international terrorist organizations in the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi. The attack was conducted by the fighters, who benefited from intensive air and organizational support to NATO in their struggle against Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.
The story about the killing of the US Ambassador in Benghazi is shrouded in mystery indeed. Reportedly, President Obama knew about the plans to attack the embassy in Benghazi. Obama was informed about the need to conduct the rescue operation, but the president decided not to hold it for unknown reasons. The CIA Director, the US Secretary of State, one admiral and eight generals resigned six months afterwards. Obviously, President Obama was aware of what was happening in the embassy, but decided not to conduct a special operation to save the lives of US citizens working there. Some time later, Hillary Clinton delivered a speech before Congress in late January of 2013, then she fell ill and resigned after the election.
Afterwards, Hillary Clinton was summoned to appear at Congress hearings. However, she did not come, having claimed that she had suffered a concussion when she fell due to flu-caused dehydration. Some time later, though, Clinton came up with a more "compelling" reason not to go to the hearing - a blood clot.
It is obvious that such conduct was not an attempt to avoid the consequences of "errors in policy" that consisted in the support of the Libyan rebels who committed the attack. The actual cause of such behavior was more sinister. Namely, the murder of US Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi was committed by the State Department. Moreover, the murder was an integral part of the policy of the Department of State. Hillary Clinton would have killed Stevens anyway.
Christopher Stevens was killed because he criticized the policies of the Obama administration, particularly Hillary Clinton, in the Middle East. The ambassador condemned the US strategy of state terrorism supported by organized crime groups, which the State Department calls either "freedom fighters" or "terrorists" depending on the political situation.
After the Benghazi attack, Clinton claimed responsibility for what happened in Libya and carried out a series of reforms to strengthen the security of US diplomats.
"After the attacks, I stood next to President Obama as Marines carried his casket and those of the other three Americans off the plane at Andrews Air Force Base. I took responsibility. And, as part of that, before I left office, I launched reforms to better protect our people in the field and help reduce the chance of another tragedy happening in the future," Hillary Clinton said. Sounds like a good key to the future, taking into account the circumstances and the presidential ambitions of the former Secretary of State.
The fact that a real monster can take office as US president is a problem for the whole world. The monster is a woman of extremely dubious moralities, who does not shun plotting mass crimes, murders and cooperation with international terrorists, who then tells reckless lies and avoids responsibility for what she has done. What future will the world have with such a monster as US president?
... que la justicia le caiga: las motos lujosas que vendió a Otto Júnior Pérez Leal y ... de sus exministros de Finanzas, Haroldo Rodas, Ana de Molina y más. ... de Agenfinsa y JI Cohen, metidos en negocios corruptos de salud.
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
Israeli Company That Fenced in Gaza Wants To Build Trump's Mexico Wall
The border security business is thriving and that’s good news for Magal Security Systems Ltd. boss Saar Koursh. His biggest showroom: the Gaza Strip.
The Israeli company, which wrapped Gaza in a fence to prevent militant attacks, has helped construct barriers along the Egyptian and Jordanian frontiers. It’s now competing for the contract to build a wall on Kenya’s border with Somalia, Koursh, Magal’s chief executive officer, said. If Donald Trump makes it to the White House, Mexico could be next.
“The border business was down, but then came ISIS and the Syrian conflict,” Koursh, 44, said in an interview, using an acronym for Islamic State. “The world is changing and borders are coming back big-time.”
Mounting jihadist violence and waves of migration have created a surging demand for fortified frontiers. Critics question the long-term effectiveness of such defenses, arguing that improved intelligence, along with solutions to political, social and economic problems, would be more effective.
Shares Gain
Gaza, the scene of three wars with Israel since 2008, has become a key sales prop for Magal’s “smart fences,” which are integrated with video cameras, ground sensors, motion detectors and satellite monitoring. Palestinians say Israel’s fencing project has turned the Hamas-ruled area into a prison trapping its 1.8 million residents.
The controversy hasn’t deterred investors. Magal’s Nasdaq-traded American Depositary Receipts have risen 23 percent this year. That’s among the best in comparison to 183 peers with a market capitalization above $50 million, and well above the average 0.3 percent gain, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Revenue rose 7 percent in the first quarter to $12.6 million. While gross profits also increased, the company posted a net loss of $500,000 as the shekel’s strength against the dollar “negatively affected the financial expenses.”
Koursh said he is looking for growth beyond Israel and Magal’s biggest market in the U.S., eyeing acquisitions in Europe. The company will also put a greater emphasis on selling products -- such as fences, cameras and detection equipment -- over project management.
Magal’s $14 million acquisition in April of Ontario-based Aimetis Corp., a maker of video surveillance equipment, led to a “smart city” product that it plans to introduce in the Tel Aviv suburb of Holon. The company signed a draft agreement last week for a $5 million plan to line the city’s streets with hundreds of cameras linked to alarm systems, intercoms and emergency buttons in public areas.
Kenya’s Project
Kenya’s planned 682-kilometer (425-mile) border project would be bigger than anything Magal has ever been involved with, at an estimated cost of 1.54 trillion shillings ($15.2 billion) if built along the entire stretch. Koursh said Magal, which built and operates the perimeter security system for Nairobi’s Mombasa port, has made presentations at government ministries.
“We put a smart fence around the entire Gaza Strip,” he said in an interview last month in Nairobi, Kenya, where he was part of a business delegation Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu led to Africa. “Anybody can give you a very nice Powerpoint, but few can show you such a complex project as Gaza that is constantly battle-tested.”
Since 2011, Kenyan troops have been battling al-Qaeda linked al-Shabab militants in Somalia. Mwenda Njoka, a spokesman for Kenya’s Interior Ministry, didn’t respond to e-mailed questions seeking details on the project.
U.S. Border
“Israel is known as a leader in developing anti-intruder systems because of the threats it faces constantly,” said Yiftach Shapir, a senior fellow specializing in military technology at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv. He said such barriers “are not impermeable, especially with a very long border like in the southern U.S that needs constant patrolling.”
That’s not stopping Magal from closely following Trump’s controversial proposal to build a barrier to stop undocumented immigrants from slipping across the 2,000 mile-long border between the U.S. and Mexico.
“We would join forces with a major U.S. defense company that has experience with such projects worldwide,” Koursh said. “We’ve done it in the past and we would definitely want to do it.