9/11:Thermite Still Best Explanation For WTC Collapse,Workers Illnesses,
I don't doubt the veracity of those witnesses who heard explosions at the base of the WTC on September 11,2001,but just like the planes that may or not have been able to have penetrated the steel structure that neither would have been likely to cause a collapse and Israelis dancing in celebration who were captured and then released by our corrupt Israeli controlled U.S. government as well as Israeli company ICTS International who controlled Lgan Airport Boston and allowed those planes 11 and 175 to take off that day with allged 9/11 Al Qaeda terrorists on board yet with no video surveillence cameras to prove it -Israel should be investigated as well as Larry Silverstein's and Israeli Australian partner Frank Lowy who both made windfall profits from their insurance scam after the fact.
Still Menachem Atzmon and Shin Beit agents who guarded Logan on 9/11 and who have direct reationship to Benjamin Netanyahu and who gained control and access through stock fraud that allowed them to buy Hunleigh airport security rent-a-cops and the contract to guard the airport through stock fraud,shuld have been invesigated just like the 'dancing Israelis' of Mossad and their moving van company who were arrested that day and then released in NJ and NYC.THEY ARE THE ONES NO DOUBT WHO DONALD TRUMP 'MISTOOK' FOR ARABS.
However those explosions heard by witnesses to the event may well have been necessary to cause the buildings to fall exactly in the uniform manner one would see in any controlled demolition and Larry Silverstein himself used the term 'pull it'' of a controlled demolition to describe the demolition of Building 7,it is probable that conventioonal demolition explosions were used to engender the type of collapse observed.
Nov 9, 2018 - Uploaded by fatimamovement
Archived by www.OurLadyisGod.com.
Larry Silverstein, who made billions of dollars from the attacks ... Haaretz reported that he was such good friends with Benjamin Netanyahu that he spoke with him on the phone every Sunday. ... Frank Lowy was not at the WTC on 9/11.
http://www.bollyn.com/
Why are so many WTC First Responders dying?
June 20, 2019
Christopher Bollyn on the Cause of the High Mortality Among the First Responders
URL Link: www.youtube.com/watch
URL Link: www.youtube.com/watch
Thousands of first responders and others who worked on or near "the pile" of the destroyed World Trade Center are very sick and dying, as this current news story points out:
"9/11 responder who appeared with Jon Stewart on Capitol Hill is now in hospice care"
What is the cause of the extremely high mortality rate among the firemen, policemen, and others who worked on or near "the pile"? This is the crucial question that Jon Stewart and others in the controlled media have ignored since September 2001.
WHY DO THEY IGNORE IT?
Why does the controlled media ignore the obvious cause of the rare cancers and other systemic diseases that have killed so many 9/11 first responders?
The reason why the controlled media - and Jon Stewart - avoid discussing the cause of the rare cancers and other diseases that have killed so many of New York's finest is because they are trying to protect the official myth of what happened on 9/11 -- and its utterly false explanation of what brought down the Twin Towers.
I understand that many people like Jon Stewart because he made them laugh as a comedian on the long-running Daily Show, which he hosted. Stewart is, however, also on the board of directors of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum, a tax-free organization dedicated to supporting and teaching the false account of what happened on 9/11 -- and that is not so funny, to say the least.
Stewart and the controlled media who support the official myth of 9/11 will not go near the subject of what has caused the high mortality among the first responders because understanding the cause of the disease also blows the official 9/11 myth to smithereens, just like the Twin Towers.
Because this subject is so important, and because there is so much confusion about it, I need to be very clear in my explanation. One person asked me if there were many sick first responders from the Pentagon site, which is a good question.
I have not heard about any sick first responders from the Pentagon, although there may be some, and that is because the two sites were very different. The Pentagon site was, of course, much smaller and involved fewer responders, but more importantly, the fire was quickly put out at the Pentagon whereas the "fires" burned beneath the WTC rubble for more than three months.
A bluish smoke, laden with toxic ultra-fine particles, rose from the pile for three months after 9/11.
This is the key: understanding that these "fires" raged for more than three months - beneath the rubble - and that the smoke that was produced by these "fires" was extremely toxic exposes the falseness of the official explanation of what brought down the towers.
These "fires" were not normal fires, but extremely hot chemical reactions that burned beneath the rubble despite being continuously doused with water. We know that these hot-spots were hotter than boiling iron because the smoke that they produced contained nano-size particles of iron and other elements. This was the subject of one of my key research articles about 9/11: "Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?"
SIZE MATTERS
The smoke from "the pile" was extremely toxic because it contained "unprecedented amounts" of extremely small (i.e. nano-size) particles. Because these particles are so small they are able to pass through the protective barriers in the body until they wind up in the nucleus of the human cell, where they do immense damage to our health.
The first responders working on the pile did not have respirators.
The first responders worked on the smoking pile without respirators, which was "like working in the stack of an incinerator," as professor Thomas Cahill told me:
The conditions were "brutal" for people working at Ground Zero without respirators and slightly less so for those working or living in adjacent buildings, Cahill, a professor emeritus of physics and atmospheric science, said. "It was like they were working inside the stack of an incinerator," he said. "The debris pile acted like a chemical factory. It cooked together the components of the buildings and their contents, including enormous numbers of computers, and gave off gases of toxic metals, acids and organics for at least 6 weeks," he said.The DELTA Group's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures," Cahill said, "namely the boiling point of the metal."- Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble? Bollyn, May 2006
The people, like Jon Stewart, who are involved in the 9/11 cover-up cannot discuss the peculiar toxicity of the smoke that has sickened and killed so many people in New York because it would raise questions about what produced this deadly smoke. Pray tell, why did iron boil beneath the rubble? This subject simply cannot be discussed by those protecting the official myth because it demolishes their explanation of what brought down the towers on 9/11.
This is why I have spent so much time trying to explain this matter. It is an urgent matter of public health and scientific integrity, and it completely exposes the pack of lies we have been told about what caused the destruction of the World Trade Center, and that is of the utmost importance.
Support Bollyn's work on Patreon
Recommended reading:
"Robert Oswain R.I.P. - NYPD Victim of Toxic WTC Smoke," Bollyn.com, May 18, 2010
"Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?" Bollyn.com, May 6, 2006
Jon Stewart and 9/11 - Is it all a show?
June 18, 2019
Jon Stewart and the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund – Is it all a show?
"Accountability doesn’t appear to be something that occurs in this chamber… I'm sorry if I sound angry and undiplomatic, but I am angry, and you should be too."
– Jon Stewart before the House Judiciary Committee, June 11, 2019
Jon Stewart (born Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz) became famous as the television comedian who hosted a satirical news program, called The Daily Show on Comedy Central. Recently, Stewart has been in the news speaking before the House Judiciary Committee to discuss reauthorizing the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. At one point Stewart lashed out at the congressmen telling them: "You should be ashamed of yourselves."
His televised performance before the committee is clearly a dishonest effort by Stewart to claim the moral high ground in the sordid saga of 9/11.
Why do I say Stewart is being dishonest?
It is dishonest because the primary cause of the cancers and mortality among the first responders, the ultra-fine particles in the smoke that rose from the pile, is being ignored. The smoke that the first responders were exposed to for the first three months on the pile was laden with unprecedented amounts of toxic ultra-fine particles (i.e. nano-particles).
Why are the ultra-fine particles in the smoke being ignored by Stewart?
Stewart is not ignoring the extremely toxic nature of the smoke because he doesn't understand the toxicity of ultra-fine particles. That is easy to understand. Ultra-fine particles are particulate matter of nanoscale size (less than 0.1 of a micron in diameter). These extremely small particles are dangerous to our health because of their size, which allows them to pass through the body until they wind up getting lodged in the nucleus of the human cell where they wreak havoc on the human system.
If it is so simple to grasp the toxic nature of the smoke, why is it not being discussed?
Jon Stewart and the other clowns involved in the 9/11 cover-up cannot address the peculiar toxicity of the smoke that rose from the pile because that would require an explanation that they cannot face.
As I explained in my article from May 2006 entitled, "Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?":
The DELTA Group's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, [Dr. Thomas] Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures," Cahill said, "namely the boiling point of the metal."
Stewart and others involved in the cover-up ignore the toxic nature of the smoke because it came from hot-spots hotter than boiling iron, and they don't want to talk about what was creating these extremely hot reactions under the pile.
Why do I say that Jon Stewart is part of the cover-up?
Stewart is on the board of directors of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum, which is an institution to promote the official myth of what happened on 9/11. The chairman of the board of this institution of propaganda is the former mayor, Michael Bloomberg. If Stewart were truly serious about helping those afflicted by the toxic smoke he would spare us the crocodile tears and start asking the questions that need to be heard, like what made so many first responders so sick? But then, if Stewart were serious about 9/11 he would focus his attention on who did it and why it was done.
Sources: Jon Stewart, director, 9/11 Memorial and Museum https://www.911memorial.org/jon-stewart
"Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?" Christopher Bollyn, May 6, 2006http://www.bollyn.com/why-did-iron-boil-beneath-the-rubble
"The Toxic Smoke from the Rubble," Bollyn, September 13, 2007http://www.bollyn.com/the-toxic-smoke-from-the-rubble/
"The Smoking Gun of 9-11," Bollyn, October 15, 2012http://www.bollyn.com/13879/
No comments:
Post a Comment