When have you ever heard that in English 'Pull it' means to evacuate a building of firefighters or anyone else?But if you ask any demolition team what 'pull it' means they will tell you it means to demolish it.Larry Silverstein has been involved in real estate scvams for decades if not millenioa so why didn't he kbow hat when he told the media he gave orders to 'pull it' when he mean tt evacuate firefighters? Note also that Silverstein NEVER mentioned ICTS International and Menachem Atzmon's role in allowing the planes alleged to have hit the WTC which and Israeli Australian terrorist billionaire Lowry made windfall profits' from in his litigation with the airlines tht hired them !Judge Hellerstein spent years monopolizing the case against ICTS brought by various family members of victims only to prevent the litigants a fast and fair trial.
NOTE JUDGE HELLERSTEIN'S OBVIOUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AS A PRO Israel Zionist who no doubt influenced his son's immigration to Israel immediately followimng 9/11.nOTE ALSO THAT HIS SON HAS BEEN EMPLOYED BY A UK ROTHSCHILD CONCERN THAT HELPED PLACE ICTS ON NASDAQ IN 1999 AND WAS GUILTY OF STOCK FRAUD AGAINST AMERICANS BUT THAT WAS COVER UP AS WELL PARTICULARLY BY THE SEC.
9/11-WTC7 Larry Silverstein says 'PULL IT' (INSIDE JOB ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I
Feb 16, 2008 - Uploaded by TUMNIAISETU
9/11-WTC7 Larry Silverstein says 'PULL IT' (INSIDE JOB) ....WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not ...WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7: "Pulling" Building 7
www.wtc7.net/pullit.html
ERROR: '"Pull-It": Silverstein Slipped Up, Admitting WTC 7's
911review.com/errors/wtc/pullit.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinanswers.htm
Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges
Says "pull it" meant to evacuate firefighters, but there were no firefighters in the building
Says "pull it" meant to evacuate firefighters, but there were no firefighters in the building
After nearly two years of steadfast silence, Silverstein Properties have finally responded to questions about what Larry Silverstein meant when he told a PBS documentary that WTC Building 7 was "pulled" in the late afternoon of September 11 2001.
Building 7 occupied a city block immediately north of the World Trade Center complex. Photos taken minutes before its collapse show small fires on two or three floors. Building 7 became only the third steel building in history before or since 9/11 to collapse from fire damage. The other two were the North and South towers of the World Trade Center.
Any building that was not owned by Silverstein Properties strangely remained upright.
Photo and video evidence of the collapse shows classic indications of a controlled demolition. The standard 'crimp' in the center-left top of the building and the subsequent 'squibs' of smoke as it collapses clearly represent explosive demolition.
Even Dan Rather, commenting on the collapse for CBS News said that the collapse was, "reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323993804578614292502152144
Silverstein Loses Battle Over 9/11 Payouts
Developer Sought Billions of Dollars From Airlines for Rebuilding of World Trade Center
A federal judge on Thursday rejected developer Larry Silverstein's bid to recover billions of dollars from two airlines whose planes were used in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, a significant setback in his nearly decadelong fight for more money to rebuild the World Trade Center.
After a four-day bench trial in Lower Manhattan this week, U.S. District Court Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that an investment group led by Mr. Silverstein had already received all the compensation for which it is eligible: the $4.1 billion paid by property insurers in 2004.
Larry Silverstein shown in 2003. ASSOCIATED PRESS
Mr. Silverstein—who signed a 99-year-lease to control the Twin Towers six weeks before they were destroyed—in 2004 sued American Airlines and United Airlines for more than $8 billion in damages, alleging they were responsible for reckless security breaches.
Judge Hellerstein said Thursday that giving Mr. Silverstein's group money in addition to what he received from insurers would effectively compensate Mr. Silverstein twice for the same losses, something barred by New York state law. Therefore, Mr. Silverstein "would not be able to recover anything" if the case against the airlines and their insurers were able to go forward, the judge said.
A spokesman for Mr. Silverstein's company, Silverstein Properties Inc., said the company was disappointed by the decision and vowed to appeal.
"We will not rest until we have exhausted every option to assure that the aviation industry's insurers pay their fair share toward the complete rebuilding of the World Trade Center," the spokesman, Bud Perrone, said in an email............
No comments:
Post a Comment