Thursday, September 10, 2015

British East India Company,European Royals,N.M.Rothschilds,Lloyds Of London

British East India Company,European Royals,N.M.Rothschilds,Loyds Of London

'Why after 275 year after its inception when this British Eat India Company was dissolved,all properties by Lloyds(a behemoth of insurance companies)which is a subsidiary of N.M.Rothschild And Company ?'



 http://greatgameindia.com/east-india-company-part-i-noble-motives/



East India Company was a group of British Merchants that joined together and formed a company whom the British, Dutch, French and Belgium Kings gave unbridled charter rights to Trade over vast India, China, Far East Asia and Africa. This company had 40 owners. They elected a Governor, a Deputy Governor and a board consisting of 24 Directors. The same structure was identically followed when the Bank of England was chartered. Who are these 40 share holders/owners of this company? Also East India Company is not one but 4 companies chartered in 4 different countries and all are owned by the same owners ruled by the same Governor, Deputy Governor and elected Directors. They are British East India Company, French East India Company, Belgium East India Company and Dutch East India Company. We also know that in 1858 one of these four, British East India Company was relieved from managing India and India became part of British Empire, while other East India Companies functioned until late 20th Century.




East India Company – Part I Noble Motives


East-India-Company1
In the year 1600 East India Company was formed and given exclusive right to trade with India and South East Asia by the British Monarchy under the concept of Free Trade and Globalization. It was also given the right to civilize India. In the year 1965 the Club of Rome (top industrial houses-real owners of EICs or MNCs) divided the world in 10 economic segments and gave unbridled authority to ruthlessly exploit Segment 9 (India belongs to this segment 9), a group of mineral (diamond, gold, uranium, life saving medicinal plants, organic food and drinking water) oil and natural gas rich South East Asian nations consisting one third of the population of the world- under liberalization (liberalize domestic economy to globalize its owners) and privatization (privatize so that Free Trade can further control domestic economy via global owners) to a group of MNCs. This series of articles examines the group of MNCs involved, and tries to trace back the current ownership of these MNCs to the same owners, controllers of East India Companies 400 years earlier. Also we wish to present that the ideologies of trade are same as far as EICs or MNCs are concerned, what changed was just a flip of words. It is the same grand children of the original owners of East India Company which subjugated us ruthlessly, exploited miserably, slaughtered close to millions of innocents for sheer economic gain and to dislodge whom India took almost 100 years of intense struggle. We never recovered from the economic, social and geographical loss of that oppressive British EIC rule. It is the reemergence of this colonial monster EICs as MNCs in the modern time again to help modernize and civilize India that may lead to another round of 400 year spiritual disaster (the only strength that we retained from being commercialized), if we do not watch the real intentions and motivations of these EICs turned MNCs and their Indian collaborators – domestic Indian Partners.
Introduction

In the year 1600 East India Company was formed and given exclusive right to trade with India and South 
What we know
British, Dutch, French and Belgium Kings gave unbridled charter rights to Trade over vast India, China, Far East Asia and Africa. This company had 40 owners. They elected a Governor, a Deputy Governor and a board consisting of 24 Directors. The same structure was identically followed when the Bank of England was chartered. Who are these 40 share holders/owners of this company? Also East India Company is not one but 4 companies chartered in 4 different countries and all are owned by the same owners ruled by the same Governor, Deputy Governor and elected Directors. They are British East India Company, French East India Company, Belgium East India Company and Dutch East India Company. We also know that in 1858 one of these four, British East India Company was relieved from managing India and India became part of British Empire, while other East India Companies functioned until late 20th Century.
East India Company was a group of British Merchants that joined together and formed a company whom the 
This series is written in four sections, subdivided into parts. Section -1examines the Origin of these EICs, their motives and the motives of MNCs along with the commodities EICs dealt with and MNCs plan to deal with or are already dealing with. This East India Company’s commodities of trade were praised by both Adam Smith (father of Modern Economics) and Karl Marx (father of Democratic Socialism or Communism) as necessary for civilizing mankind and making it noble.
Section – 2 examines the elusive owners of these MNCs and traces back their roots to the East India Company. But in reality East India Companies (British East India Company, French East India Company and Dutch East India Company) in their noble cause of civilizing mankind looted close to $1.6 trillion worth of wealth from the countries they traded with, ruthlessly exploited more than dozen countries by selling their subjects as slaves, killed more than 100 million people in order to maximize their profit and minimize their cost, encouraged wholesale addiction of opium among 30 million people, created more than 30 famines all across the nations. These gigantic behemoth East India Companies were the true Multinationals of their time. They disappeared from the face of earth (we should believe so) and reappeared as Multi-National Corporations controlled by the same owners, their heirs as successors. This part examines the origin of these industrial houses that owned EICs and the other industrial houses that were involved with these East India Companies.
Section – 3 examines why the above facts never come to light. This section examines the media (print, electronic-television, movies) control exercised by the same EICs in those days and MNCs today. In Section – 4 we see the behemoth MNCs economic, media power in action-Liberalization and Privatization. How these two noble concepts since 1935-1995 bankrupted 20 countries in South America, Russia, robbed them from their trillions of dollars mineral, oil and natural gas wealth and plunged these countries in perpetual debt, governments in total chaos, leadership in perennial disarray, people in damning despotism, all the while killing millions in unwanted unnecessary conflicts just to sell their arms to fight and medicines to cure injuries. Then we depict the Indian scenario, and advise the reader to draw his own conclusion as to the progress of (thrusting through the neck of Indians by manipulating state central governments) Liberalization and Privatization in India in the above light-as EICs projected that Free Trade will help Indians, and to reexamine the need to change our course of action surely to save millions of Indians from sure path of destruction.
The Beginning
The East India Company (the “Company“) was one of the institutions created as a product of the Venetian Merchants takeover of England’s commerce. In England it was called British East India Company. The Levant Company, set up to trade with the East, had been formed in 1592 as a fusion of the Turkey Company (with predominant partnership by the house of Sassoon, fathers- in-law of Rothschild) and the Venice Company (probably the House of Rothschild). In 1600 the East India Company was formed as a spin-off (subsidiary of) of the Levant Company. It received a perpetual charter from the British Monarchy for a monopoly on trade with the East Indies. This East India Company had many partners under various names belonging to various nations, Dutch, British, Belgium and French East India Companies and Dutch, British and French East African Companies and received same perpetual charters from all these countries.
Most importantly the Levant Company or the Turkey Company or the Venice Company and the East India Companies are all partnerships. Meaning they need not declare their profits, nor assets nor the partner names or addresses. An appointed representative of the company will file returns and act as liaison of the principal owners. Worst with the East India Company was that it was a subsidiary of The Levant Company. As we see with many Multi National Companies (MNCs) that are forming partnership in India are also Subsidiaries of some other holding companies, and these holding companies in turn are subsidiaries of another set of numbered companies and these numbered companies in turn are held in trusts and these trusts are held in partnership, and the partnership address is a P.O. Box number somewhere in Central London or in New York. We see only the officers and lawyers of these MNCs not the real owners. It is the identification of the ownership of these MNCs and EICs that will solve the puzzle of disappeared EICs, a puzzle probably except Japan none in Asia ever understood. Indians never thought of it so never worried about it and do not care about it.
Who are these 40 persons who owned this company? Why did the British Government pledge its soldiers for this company for next 400 years conquering every land this company touched? Where did the money they made in the company go – to the British Government or to the owners? How much money they made? What are the commodities these traders traded? Why after 275 years after its inception when this British East India Company was dissolved, all properties were absorbed by Lloyds (a behemoth of Shipping Insurance under writing and investment Bank) which is a subsidiary of N.M. Rothschild & Co? Though after Mrs. Victoria proclaimed India as part of British Empire why the Indian affairs were run by the Privy Council, and Chancellor Exchequer of British Treasury who happened to be all the time the Chairman of Bank of England, another Family bank of the House of Rothschild? And finally why Sir Stafford Cripps, another Chancellor Exchequer and Bank of England Chairman, and a representative of EICs in 1946 decides that India has to be given independence;as one of the reasons put forwarded by him for the cause of independence was “the revenue from India was not enough to cover the expenses of running India”? This gave plenipotentiary powers to Mr. Mountbatten to decide on the spot without any consultation with British parliament, the fate of India.
Jul – Sept 2015, Volume 01 Issue 01
To read full article just share it !

....................................

    The East India Company and its role in ruling India

    www.historic-uk.com › ... › History UK › History of England

    A short history of the East India Company, the largest and most powerful companythe ... and Dutch were able to take more of an active role in trade with the East Indies. .... Rothschild family had a controlling interest in the East India Company.

    Timeline of the Rothschild family - The French Connection

    www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm

    Hitchcock has this Rothschild history available as a paper book in the UK: ..... MayerRothschild invested this $3,000,000 in, gold from the East India Company ..... sell their Caspian and Black Sea Petroleum Company to Royal Dutch and Shell.

    The Rothschild Illuminati Colonization of India - The Daily ...

    thedailycoin.org/?p=19028

    Feb 16, 2015 - That was before the East India Company was granted the Charter to trade ... India, suggesting the healthy maritime trade of a busy Dutch East ...

    Chapter Eight - The Jewish Connection - Edward Jay Epstein

    edwardjayepstein.com/diamond/chap8.htm

    The Dutch maneuvered to gain control of this traffic, but now they had to contend ... According to the records of the British East India Company, Jewish traders .... He appealed to Lord Rothschild, whose bank still owned a large block of stock in ...

    The Atlantean Conspiracy - 08

    www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/.../atlantean_conspiracy08.htm

    The Committee of 300 evolved out of the British East India Company's Council of 300 which was founded in 1727 by the British royal family. For decades the British East India and Dutch East India Companies ... David and Evelyn Rothschild.

    East India Company – Part I Noble Motives - Great Game India

    greatgameindia.com/east-india-company-part-i-noble-motives/

    7 days ago - In the year 1600 East India Company was formed and given exclusive ... East India Company, Belgium East India Company and Dutch East India Company. ... and the Venice Company (probably the House of Rothschild).

    Ajit Vadakayil: WORTH MORE THAN THE SUM TOTAL OF ...

    ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/.../worth-more-than-sum-total-of-entire.html

    Feb 10, 2011 - Rothschild family owned the East India Company. ... They own controlling interests in the worlds largest oil company Royal Dutch Shell.

    How The Jews Took Great Britain | Real Jew News

    www.realjewnews.com/?p=86

    Dec 18, 2007 - WILLIAM STADHOLDER, a Dutch army careerist, was a handsome chap ... tapped from the British East India Company which Mayer Rothschild ...

    • Image result for dutch east india company rothschild
    • Image result for dutch east india company rothschild
    • Image result for dutch east india company rothschild
    • Image result for dutch east india company rothschild
    • Image result for dutch east india company rothschild
    • Image result for dutch east india company rothschild
    More images for dutch east india company rothschild

  1. Makow -The 'Jewish' Conspiracy Is British Imperialism - Rense

    www.rense.com/general53/brith.htm

    Their identity is kept secret but Rothschild is certainly one of them. ... It lords over such corporate giants as Royal Dutch Shell, Imperial Chemical Industries, .... The British East India Company who snuck into India under the guise of traders first ...

No comments:

Post a Comment