Saturday, July 28, 2012

U.S.pResident Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro never legally changed his name ?

U.S.pResident Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro never legally changed his name ?

I have been chastised before on siding with the right wing who have questioned Barack  Obama's   Connecticut social security card number and I've doubted his internet birth certificate but I just decided to search any info available on the internet re his name change and whether he did it legally or just decided one day to call himself Barack Hussein Obama without bothering to change it legally.(Which is kind of funny and not funny ha ha but funny peculiar because in the last four years he has shown himself to be further to the right that W Bush,Adolph Hitler and Idi Amin combined !)
NOW IT LOOKS LIKE THIS MAY WELL BE THE CASE AND HIS NAME IS STILL LEGALLY BARRY SOETORO..As you can see I Google searched the names 'barack obama and barry soetoro' plus 'legal name change' and found I wasn't the only one to contemplate the fact that he may not have changed his name legally and Americans may not be calling him by his legal name nor is he signing anything with his legal name !:

But the scam goes much deeper. Reviewing only the admissions of Barack Obama, we are told that Obama was born to U.S. citizen Stanley Ann Dunham, legally adopted by a foreign national named Lolo Soetoro, had taken the name Barry SOETORO, and was given Indonesian citizenship. He was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia, and attended a school there that accepted all faiths. At one point, Barry SOETORO moved to Hawaii to reside with his grandparents after Lolo SOETORO and Stanley Ann DUNHAM divorced. Obama completed high school as Barry SOETORO Much is missing from his early years, including a legal name change from Barry SOETORO to Barack Hussein Obama II. Absent of any document to show the legal process of a name change within the U.S., it is likely that the man sitting in the Oval Office is, in fact, Barry SOETORO.
The above would also serve to explain the discrepancies with his social security number and region of issuance, a matter we are very familiar with in our capacity as licensed investigators. The reasons we have seen published concerning the allegations of the association of multiple social security numbers with Barry SOETORO and Barack Hussein OBAMA has always bothered us, but not necessarily for the reasons often published. After careful and extensive analysis, it appears that many of the numbers and name variations associated with Obama are what we would describe as “database chaff.” It is not uncommon for database repositories to erroneously associate different numbers, addresses and sometimes names to an individual. The reasons for this are many and beyond the scope of this article, but it happens.

Below is the complete article that I just quoted above.:

 The unraveling of Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama II

To those who are now speaking out about the Obama eligibility matter, I can think of no better statement than the one uttered by a very frustrated Officer John McClane, played by Bruce Willis in the movie“Die Hard.” In order to get the attention of a police officer oblivious to the carnage taking place inside of the Nakatomi Plaza building after making a very cursory inspection and finding nothing amiss,McClane tosses the body of a terrorist from an office window window onto the windshield of the police cruiser and fires at the police car, yelling “welcome to the party, pal.”

I suspect that this statement accurately reflects the sentiment of numerous individuals and groups who have been fighting in the real world trenches for full disclosure of all of Barack Hussein Obama’s records, including his birth certificate, for the last three years. People such as Commander Charles Kerchner (retired) and Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Pennsylvania Attorney Philip BergReverend David Manning of Atlah Ministries,  and numerous others who have spoken out and taken their valiant fight for full disclosure of Obama’s records to the nation’s courts, only to be struck down for lack of standing or other arbitrary judicial opinions.
Due to the recent public statements by billionaire businessman turned reality television star about the birth certificate issue, the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama has gained equal amounts of renewed interest and contempt by the American media and a vocal segment of the American public. The latter display of contempt is nicely displayed by some recent interview clips, including the priceless Meredith Viera interview of Donald Trump where she can hardly hold back her disdain of Mr. Trump and the entire eligibility matter, and Donald Trump’s appearance on “The View” last month.
On “The View,” Mr. Trump wreaked havoc among the cadre of women co-hosts when he merely mentioned the lack of a legitimate birth certificate provided by Obama. Lacking any coherent or intellectual rebuttals to Trump’s claims, a not-so veiled accusation of racism was leveled against Trump by “The View” co-host Whoppi Goldberg, while Barbara Walters expressed discomfort with the matter by simply wanting to change the topic.

“Welcome to the party, pal”

During the last three years, there have been numerous individuals, authors, investigative journalists, and others (and I consider myself among them) who have been mocked, ridiculed, belittled or ignored by Obama supporters, the liberal media, and the political left for even suggesting that this issue has any merit whatsoever.
Perhaps even worse, conservatives on the right, including some high profile media personalities, have joined with the left in the same vitriolic ridicule of us so-called “Birthers,” a pejorative term ascribed to those who are merely asking for yet-unfurnished proof that Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally eligible to occupy the office of the President of the United States.
It has been only after Donald Trump began to ask the same questions others have been asking for the last three years that the matter appears to have morphed from a fringe topic into legitimacy. For example, Rush Limbaugh, who has kept this topic at arm’s length, has taken delight of the Viera interview, although it’s difficult to discern whether Mr. Limbaugh is more delighted at Mr. Trump’s steam roller approach and Viera’s reaction, or that the issue is being finally exposed in such an unlikely venue. Because Mr. Limbaugh has the ear of millions every day, I tend to gravitate to the former.
To those who are now beginning to pick up the topic because of the exposure by Donald Trump, I can only say “welcome to the party, pal.”
With all due respect to Donald Trump, he has not “legitimized” the eligibility issue, as the matter far exceeds the existence of the birth certificate and has adversely affected the lives of many patriotic Americans who have long fought for full disclosure of all of Obama’s records. Promising to be the “most transparent” president in history,  Barack Hussein Obama is the most deliberately opaque president who has withheld many more records than his birth certificate. Not only has he withheld his records, he has fought to keep them hidden from public view, amassing legal fees that some claim to exceed a million dollars of his own money, and perhaps twice that amount if pro-bono and other legal work is counted.
Also as a result of his refusal to disclose his records, a respected military physician is presently serving time in Leavenworth for refusing to obey deployment orders until he was satisfied that the orders he was given were constitutionally legal. LTC. Terry Lakin, an honored veteran with 18 unblemished and distinguished years of service, lost his legal battle and remains behind bars as Obama’s first political prisoner in the war for truth. While many may question the methods and venue in which LTC Lakin chose to take up his battle, no one can question his motives.

“The biggest scam ever”

Both Messrs Trump and Limbaugh have stated that if Obama is determined to be ineligible to hold office, it is the “biggest scam ever” perpetrated. Indeed, and that statement itself might be an understatement.
I urge those reading this and those who are pursuing the truth to avoid “battlefield myopia” and not merely cling to the existence or lack thereof of the long form, authenticated birth certificate. The issue is much greater than the birth certificate or where Obama was physically born, as he could have been born in the Lincoln bedroom during the Kennedy administration and still be ineligible to hold the office of president under Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. Our founders determined that future presidents must be born to two parents who are both U.S. citizens. Clearly then, the place of Obama’s birth is merely one concern, while the citizen aspect of his parents remains another.
But the scam goes much deeper. Reviewing only the admissions of Barack Obama, we are told that Obama was born to U.S. citizen Stanley Ann Dunham, legally adopted by a foreign national named Lolo Soetoro, had taken the name Barry SOETORO, and was given Indonesian citizenship. He was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia, and attended a school there that accepted all faiths. At one point, Barry SOETORO moved to Hawaii to reside with his grandparents after Lolo SOETORO and Stanley Ann DUNHAM divorced. Obama completed high school as Barry SOETORO Much is missing from his early years, including a legal name change from Barry SOETORO to Barack Hussein Obama II. Absent of any document to show the legal process of a name change within the U.S., it is likely that the man sitting in the Oval Office is, in fact, Barry SOETORO.
The above would also serve to explain the discrepancies with his social security number and region of issuance, a matter we are very familiar with in our capacity as licensed investigators. The reasons we have seen published concerning the allegations of the association of multiple social security numbers with Barry SOETORO and Barack Hussein OBAMA has always bothered us, but not necessarily for the reasons often published. After careful and extensive analysis, it appears that many of the numbers and name variations associated with Obama are what we would describe as “database chaff.” It is not uncommon for database repositories to erroneously associate different numbers, addresses and sometimes names to an individual. The reasons for this are many and beyond the scope of this article, but it happens.
Accordingly, an investigator is well advised not to take the information obtained from a proprietary database at face value without first analyzing the information, tossing out the chaff and concentrating on the rest, which we have done. Additionally, we have found and concur with others on this matter that the social security number associated with Obama that was issued from the SSA region in Connecticut is troublesome, but again, not necessarily for the reasons as publicly stated by others.
As we have been investigating this matter for some time (see our investigative report 1 and report 2 in PDF format for important background information), it has become apparent that at some point, the individual known as Barry SOETORO began using the name Barack Hussein Obama II. Based on our investigative findings, it was at about this same time period that the Connecticut issuance of the social security number appeared and became “attached” to the name Barack Hussein Obama. It can then be reasonably reconciled that Barry SOETORO became Barack Hussein Obama while he was a young man in New York following his mysterious trip to Pakistan on a passport that was likely not issued by the U.S.

Trump’s curious statements

As long-time investigators dealing with large corporations, we have the distinct advantage of knowing other professionals in the industry. Although we have had no contact with Mr. Trump’s investigators nor are we connected in any manner to Mr. Trump’s organization, team or efforts, we are aware of the identity of at least one who is actively working on the Obama birth certificate mystery. We are also familiar with that investigator’s associates and their areas of inquiry, so we have a fairly good understanding of what is taking place behind the scenes - and there is plenty taking place behind the scenes.
NOTE: We will be talking about this in depth on the upcoming episode of CFP Radio’s “The Hagmann & Hagmann Report” on 8-10pm EST, Saturday, 9 April 2011. Program details follow this report.
In advance of that show, however, we should address two rather curious statements made by Mr. Trump during one recent interview. When talking about his investigators in Hawaii who are looking into Obama’s birth certificate issue, he stated that “you wouldn’t believe what they’re finding.” Mr. Trump also stated that in his experience on Wall Street, he is familiar with frauds of all types, and has seen some very sophisticated frauds over the years. Well, we do have a very good idea of what is being found or verified as having been scrubbed from the records.
In our investigation, we found that the scrubbing and altering of records pertaining to Obama began well before he became an Illinois state senator in the 1996 election cycle. The “scrubbing” or alteration of records did not begin or end with Obama, but also extended to his mother and other associates as well. In fact, a very large and extremely relevant part of the investigation of Barry SOETORO, or Barack Hussein Obama II as he is known, revolves around his parents, step father, and grandparents. and extends from the U.S. mainland to Hawaii and other points across the globe.

Meteoric rise to power was well planned

To understand how a virtually unknown politician from Illinois could rise to occupy the most powerful position in the free world in less than a decade after he became a state senator, one must take a few steps backward to understand the complete picture, and that Obama was selected long before he was elected to become president. Problems with his background were numerous, however, including but not limited to his parental lineage and place of birth. These problems became apparent through a private vetting process by his own handlers, or those who are known as the “power elite” in the latter half of the last century. His handlers were and are globalists of the highest order, extending from George Soros to those above him on the proverbial pyramid capstone of globalists.
The globalists had direct and indirect ties to the Dunham family and in particular, Obama’s mother. Consider, for example, that Peter F. Geithner (father of Obama’s Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner), worked for the Ford Foundation and oversaw the work of Obama‚Äôs mother, Ann Dunham, while she was developing “microfinance programs” in Indonesia. In brief, Obama’s mother set up a large loan system in Indonesia akin to the savings and loan structure of the 1970s and 1980s. To gain a better understanding of her activities in finance, despite her background in anthropology, recall the BCCI scandal of the late 1970s. In fact, some of the same “players” who existed then continue to exist in Obama’s circles.
Our investigation into her activities and those close to Obama are continuing and will be the subject of a separate article, including how Obama as president fits into the communist China agenda in terms of global finance. Meanwhile, it’s important to take a few more steps backward in history to understand that the scrubbing of inconvenient records is not new.

Fast Rewind: Senator Joe McCarthy & the relevance to today

The majority of Americans alive today do not recall the WW II postwar era beyond the revised history contained in textbooks that rarely reflect the truth of that time. Today’s well-coiffed but intellectually deficient anchors who deliver the news to ordinary Americans know little to nothing of the gritty reality of the origins of the “cold war” between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union, and the infiltration of communist agents into American government. It is that very infiltration that has paved the way for Obama.
Mention, however, the name of former Senator Joe McCarthy and watch as they recoil in disgust, having been taught that the inquiries of Senator Joe McCarthy is a black chapter in the history books of America. Since the 9/11 attacks, some of these news anchors and pundits have actually described the vetting of Muslims for sensitive positions in the U.S. as a throwback to “McCarthyism,” while few actually using that term know the true history of communist infiltration in key government positions in the postwar era.
The truth is that communist infiltration of and through the U.S. government, particularly the State Department, was and remains a legitimate threat to America. A 106-page confidential memo dated 3 August 1946, written by State Department official Samuel Klaus, detailed the alarming levels of communist infiltration into American government. It was that memo that served as the basis of Senator Joe McCarthy launching an investigation into the threat to America from within. It was through the efforts of McCarthy that a Senate subcommittee chaired by Senator Millard Tydings requested and eventually received a copy of that memo.
As noted by M. Stanton Evans, author of Blacklisted by History, that memo would mysteriously vanish from our nation’s records. Mr. Evans notes that this historic memo is not in the legislative panel file of the Tydings panel, located in the National Archives of the U.S., and was also removed from the files of Samuel Klaus, the author of the memo, from the National Archives in March of 1993, nearly a half century after it was issued.
As painstakingly revealed by M. Stanton Evans in his extensive work Blacklisted by History, important documentation well beyond the Klaus memo relevant to exposing the level of communist infiltration into the U.S. government is not limited to government sources such as the National Archive, but also to private data sources and repositories. He lists a number of instances where records were scrubbed and consequently, created a much different and much less accurate picture of that era of U.S. history.
This topic is as relevant today as it was during the time of Senator Joe McCarty, if not even more relevant. One only has to look at the reported communist, Marxist and socialist ties in Obama’s lineage and inner circle to understand the impact of missing records.
One would do well to use the voluminous work of M. Stanton Evans as a template to understand how Americans have been deliberately misled by the media and some members of our own government into believing that the communist and socialist objectives, launched in the postwar era, have led to where we find ourselves today.
The removal of the Klaus memo from his file in March of 1993 was as deliberate as the refusal of government officials, complicit with the media moguls of today to address the lack of bona fides of Barack Hussein Obama. In fact, one could consider them an extension of the same.

What it all means

Based on investigative findings that are not discussed in the media, it would appear that the selection and election of Barack Hussein Obama was indeed the greatest scam ever pulled off against the American people. The above provides just a small portion of the critical issues surrounding Obama’s eligibility, identity and his place in U.S. and world history. The story is much larger than a single piece of paper, but that paper, if properly authenticated, will serve as the thread that will unravel the larger tangled web of the Obama legend.
To those who have just awakened to the constitutional crisis we are facing at the hands of this president, we’d like to say once again, “welcome to the party, pal.”
Douglas J. Hagmann & his son, Joseph Hagmann, both investigators, researchers and contributors to Canada Free Press, host a weekly radio program on CFP Radio called The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, broadcast live every Saturday from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET. In it’s fifth week, the program has gained in popularity, and has become one of the ten most popular radio shows on the BlogTalk Radio platform. This week’s program will be providing additional details about the problems with Obama’s eligibility to occupy the White House.


Is it Barry Soetoro or Barack Obama?

• August 11, 2008 • Uncategorized
If all of the discussion about Barack Obama’s birth certificate is hot air, why in the world doesn’t Obama simply end the buzz by handing over a physical copy of his true birth certificate? TexasDarlin reveals why here. It appears that Barack Obama’s official birth certificate actually reads Barry Soetoro. His named was changed from Barack Obama to Barry Soetoro when his mother’s husband Lolo Soetoro adopted Barack. Therefore, the original birth certificate provided by the Barack campaign, is either a fake or his name has been changed back to his birth name. Considering this new development, is Barack a dual-citizen of Indonesia and the United States? And did he use his Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan in 1981?

  1. Why did Barry Soetoro change his name to Barack Hussein Obama ...
    5 answers - Apr 11, 2010
    Why did Barry Soetoro change his name to Barack Hussein Obama? ... concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case ...
  2. Barry Soetoro's Identity and Relationship to the Name Barack ...
    Aug 9, 2010 – Today the name Barry Soetoro is an extremely popular search term ... that somewhere along the way he changed his name to Barack Obama.
  3. Birth Certificate Reads Barry Soetoro?! | Western
    Jan 27, 2011 – Does Obama's Birth Certificate Read Barry Soetoro? ... the 1970s, and his name was legally changed to Barry Soetoro at that time, ... He never filed the papers to change his name back to “Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.”, so any ...
    Oct 23, 2010 – Federal Document Dump Policy Changes After Obama Probe Begins. ... We the People can NOT allow Obama Hussein Barack to win the election in 2012 – this will be the end of ..... Obama's legal name is Barry Soetoro; and ...


Is Barack Obama AKA Barry Soetoro?
Dallas Blog ^ | April 14, 2011 | Tom McGregor

Posted on Jueves, 14 de Abril de 2011 12:59:44 a.m. by 2ndDivisionVet
The Dallas Blog has just received an e-mail from a reliable source in Texas, who said he received an interesting e-mail from a U.S. Naval officer, who obtained a fascinating letter from an I.R.S. examiner who contends that Mr. Obama’s real name is Barry Soetoro, according to alleged Top-Secret tax records.
My reliable Texas source explained that he’s not certain if it’s true, but the letter also provides a link to Obama or Soetoro’s selective service registration information, which looks highly-suspicious. Well, let the fun start and see if these allegations are true. Here’s a copy-and-paste of the letter from the IRS examiner:
Trump is right, Barry Soetoro, AKA Obama is hiding what appears to be a criminal past.
Trump is correct, Barry Soetoro, AKA Obama is hiding something in his past that is very bad... and it may not be his citizenship. (Trump would not say this if he did not know something and he has the money to get the dirt...)
As an IRS tax examiner,one of many former federal jobs, I have seen what it appears Barry Soetoro has done, mostly by illegal aliens attempting to acquire a new identity in the U.S and/or criminals looking to acquire a new ID.
Barry, AKA Obama, was lawfully adopted by a foreign national, Lolo Soetoro, and Barry's name was legally changed to "Barry Soetoro". (Barry’s own admission) Barry Soetoro was also made an official legal Indonesian citizen. (again Barry’s own admission) The adoption would be noted in Barry's vital statistics record in Hawaii on his original birth certificate... OR Lolo Soetoro may have always been Barry's legal birth farther. The public does not know for sure at this point who Barry's father really was and Barry himself may not know.
Barry was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia and attended a Catholic funded school that permitted all faiths to attend.
Barry's mother dropped him as a dependent for some reason, maybe even when Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. His mother's passport records dropped Barry as a dependent indicating Barry was no longer a legal dependent of his mothers. (The passport records of his mother have been produced showing Barry was no longer a dependent when Barry was permanently residing in Indonesia.) Barry went to Hawaii to live with his alleged grand parents after Lolo Soetoro and Barry's mother divorced.
A "certificate of live birth" can have names changed on it including a child's birth name, and birth parent’s names. Even a modified date of birth can be on a "certificate of live birth". This occurs frequently for adopted children where the birth parent does not want the child to know who they are. The public has no idea who Barry’s real birth father is or who Barry’s real birth mother is. (Barry could have been adopted by his mother) The original birth certificate is the only legal vital statistics record of a person’s birth parents, birth location, birth date, etc… I can get a “certificate of live birth” for a dead person; I cannot get a birth certificate of a dead person without “Deceased” on it. (I’ve tried)
There is no evidence Barry Soetoro ever lawfully changed his name to “Barrack Hussein Obama”. There is no proof Barry Soetoro was born with the name "Barrack Hussein Obama". I’m willing to bet the name “Barrack Hussein Obama” is not present on the real birth certificate as Barry’s birth name or as Barry’s birth father. I have pictures of me with my mother and Jimmy Buffet… that doesn’t make him my father even if I start using the name Jimmy Buffet.
The public knows Barry Soetoro finished high school in Hawaii as Barry Soetoro and attended Occidental as Barry Soetoro where he did drugs and flunked out of school. After dropping out of Occidental, Barry showed up in New York, homeless and on drugs. (Barry’s own admission) Barry then hooked up with a Pakistani to live with and traveled back to Indonesia on his new boyfriend’s dime to renew his Indonesian passport and traveled to Pakistan with him.
Ask any law enforcement officer in a large city or detective and they will tell you homeless young men on drugs in large cities usually end up as male prostitutes. Barry ended up as a world traveler with a degree… (Not likely)
Barry Soetoro returned to New York from Pakistan and began using the fictitious nameObama” for some reason. (again Barry Soetoro’s own admission) One could only suspect that a person addicted to drugs returning from Pakistan to New York, the main route for Afghan heroin into the U.S., maybe Barry had a reason to start using a new name. There are literally over 1 million open warrants on file in New York… maybe Barry is one of them?....
After spending some time in New York allegedly working under the nameObama”, It appears Barry used the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" for the first time to file his federal taxes in Connecticut at a Post Office Box for the purpose of evading paying taxes in New York and /or to establish a new identity. (This is a felony with no statute of limitation.)
When the IRS received Barry Soetoro’s federal tax filing, the IRS could not attach the name Barrack Hussein Obama to the SSI number provided or the address provided. So the IRS assigned the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" a tax ID number for a person from Connecticut (Where Barry unlawfully filed a federal tax form using a false name). Barry Soetoro began using the tax ID number as his SSI number when using the fictitious name Barrack Obama. This is why Barry Soetoro has a Connecticut SSI number. When I worked for the IRS, I saw this occur more than once and yes, it is a felony to knowingly file a fraudulent federal tax forms. Most of the politicians that cheat on their taxes claim it was an accident. That is how they get away with their tax cheat crimes. Using a fake name is no accident.
It appears Barry fled New York to Chicago using his new identity to get a job. He likely ordered a fake diploma to bolster his new identity as "Obama". Fake Diploma's were very big in the 80's and diploma mills were even being used by federal workers to get promotions. There is evidence his alleged attendance at Columbia was faked (Barry never attended Columbia) and Barry lied his way into Harvard (he had no transcripts to get in)... Including telling the Saudi royal family he was fighting in Afghanistan with the Muslim Jihad against the Russians, so they would help him get into a law school. The Saudi's apparently loved Barry's story of Jihad in Pakistan/Afghanistan and paid for Barry to attend Harvard under the name "Obama". The Saudi family has admitted to paying for Obama to attend Harvard and gave Harvard a gift of $20 million dollars. Harvard in turn made their special attendy President of the law review a person that never wrote a single law review.... I guess that is what $20 million buys at Harvard.
It is unlikely Barry was a Jihadist and was most likely a drug mule if anything, maybe even a CIA street hire to haul Afghan heroin back to New York, so the Afghans could buy U.S. made stinger missiles with U.S. dollars to shoot down Russian helicopters?... I hired people over seas to do work below my pay grade all the time, even foreign nationals... I think this is the story Barry told the Saudi's, but he was most likely really just a drug mule/dealer and probably still wanted on an outstanding warrant in New York.
Barry’s selective service registration is not normal either…
After I looked at Barry’s selective service filing I noticed it was most likely fraudulent too based on the name he used. Barry did not start using the name "Obama" until he returned from Pakistan (long after he flunked out of school in California) His selective service record (maintained in Chicago coincidentally) shows he registered at a Hawaiian post office as “Obama” in Sept 1980... Problem, Barry was getting high in California at Occidental in Sept 1980 (Barry's own admission) and was not using the fictitious name "Obama" at that time. Barry began using the fictitious name "Obama" only after he returned from Pakistan. The selective service filing is fraudulent.
Barry returned to Chicago and attend a semi-christian radical black church with his first female love Michelle. Barry admits keeping in touch with Phil Boener, who traveled to New York from Occidental to be with Barry and was most likely Barry's first love.
Barry still could not get a real job, because he was still a fraud, even with his Harvard degree in hand he could lie and take the Bar exam, but he could not work as a lawyer for a major law firm without a back ground investigation and he would never pass one. So, Michelle got Barry a job at her law firm. Barry never filed a case alone and never filed a motion. He wrote lots of memos according to the law firm where Barry worked. (I think they know Barry is a fraud and don't want to be sued by previous clients) Barry rescinded his law licenses, so as not to be disbarred for fraud. The Bar knows Barry lied on his application. Michelle also had to turn over her law license for her involvement in corruption with the Chicago mayors office.
With time on his hands Barry, a well spoken black man, was able to get elected to a state office, oddly because he looked for fraud in his opponents voter registrations and got his opponent disqualified from running. Barry a well versed liar was a natural in state politics. He used his political influence to get himself a position as a lecturer at Chicago's law school. Barry embellished this position as a "professor of law" which everyone knows is completely false. Barry was not a professor or even a specialist at anything but lying.
On a whim Barry ran for United States Senate for the State of Illinois. Politicians do this all the time to make a name for themselves even if they can't win. At the time the Republican Ryan was a shoe in for the Senate seat, so no real Democrat contenders entered the race, but Barry did. On a fluke after the primary Ryan's wife Jeri Ryan (Seven of nine from Star Trek) went public that her husband was making her have sex with other people while he watched. Ryan dropped out and Alan Keys moved from Maryland to run against Barry Soetoro.
The election got all kinds of press because there was no blacks in the U.S. Senate and one of these black men was going to be a Senator. Alan Keys did his best to warn everyone Barry was not who he claimed to be, but the public saw him as a carpet bagger. Barry kept the lie going and presented himself as a clean black man that talked like a white man... Illinois elected Barry to U.S. Senate. The Democrats had already began scrubbing Barry's back ground when Ryan dropped out.
Phil Barry's boy friend from Occidental, was found working in California as a communications specialist (receptionist) for a dental hygienist school and given a diploma from Columbia and cover story. The rest of Barry's drug friends were all given jobs or money by the Democrat machine to keep quiet.
Because Barry was such a news maker as the only Black in the Senate, and he could speak like a white man he was made key speaker for the Democrat convention. Barry then decided to run for President to keep the lie going. No one thought to question Barry's back ground in the Democrat party... They helped cover up the ugly back ground. The only person jumping up and down warning Barry was not who he claimed to be was Alan Keys and he was discarded as just an angry loser.
Now we have a complete fraud sitting in the Office of the President. Clearly the most corrupt, inexperienced, and ignorant President in the history of the United States who's only quality is that he can lie with a straight face.
Barry Soetoro is as much of a fraud as Bernie Madoff and his house of cards will soon fall down.
March 31, 2011

Friday, July 27, 2012

Israeli Agents:Mitt Romney,SEC Mary Schapiro, IRS Doug Shulman cover up $32 trillion stolen American Assets in Offshore accounts worth $280 billion annual lost income tax revenues


Israeli Agents:Mitt Romney,SEC Mary Schapiro, IRS Doug Shulman cover up $32 trillion stolen American Assets in Offshore accounts worth $280 billion annual lost income tax revenues

Thanks to hedge fund penny stock crook IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman and his partner in FINRA crime SEC Chair Mary Schapiro 'Super Rich hold $32 TRILLION in offshore havens,much of which came from criminal activities such as stock fraud as well as self enrichment in the war frauds brought about by the 9/11 cover up that involved Israelis and European far right elites as well as their far right 'Islamic' allies in Saudi Arabia,Qatar,Bahrain,Kuwait and Dubai that Doug Shulman and Mary Shapiro further self enriched themselves by getting themselves appointed execs of FINRA aka  NASD AND SELLING IT TO THE MONEY LAUNDERING 9/11 TERRORIST STATE OF DUBAI AND ITS SHEIK MOHAMED AL RASHID BIN MAKTOUM ANDF HIS ISRAELI CONNECTED ZIONIST 'FRIENDS' ! It is NOT black American actor Leslie Snipes who should be put in jail but Douglas Shulman IT IS DOUGLAS SHULMAN WHO SHOULD BE PLACED IN JAIL ALONG WITH MARY SCHAPIRO AND THEIR MUTUAL PAL ISRAELI MONEY LAUNDERER PAL BERNIE MADOFF !Take a look at Reuters article with link below and realize the fact that that $32 trillion and the owners of those accounts in Israel,Switzerland,Lichtenstein and the Carribean is what a REAL IRS Commisioner would have gone after long ago rather than racially profiling a black actor as a ludricrous  example of a criminal tax dodger !This sleazy white racist Jewish scumbag and stock shares money lñaunderer,Douglas Shulman,even allowed the Israelis who 'guarded' Logan Airport on 9/11/01 and bought that position through stock fraud to fraudulently claim they were owed money by the IRS WHEN IN FACT THEY HAVE STOLEN MONEY THROUGH STOCK FRAUD AGAINST AMERICANS ANDF  STILL HAVE IT IN OIFFSHORE ACCOUNTS ! Isn't that right Menachen Atzmon ?!

Super rich hold $32 trillion in offshore havens

Reuters - Jul 22, 2012
LONDON, July 22 (Reuters) - Rich individuals and their families have as much as $32 trillion of hidden financial assets in offshore tax havens...

  1. IRS Revs up Whistleblower Program, under Senate Pressure

    Accounting Today - 7 hours ago
    IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman wrote a letter to Grassley this month, saying that the Whistleblower Office has approved over 90 awards so ...

  1. IRS Revs up Whistleblower Program, under Senate Pressure

    Accounting Today - 7 hours ago
    IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman wrote a letter to Grassley this month, saying that the Whistleblower Office has approved over 90 awards so ...

  2. Could Romney Get Audited?

    AlterNet - Jul 24, 2012
    In 2009, IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman announced that the IRS had created a new task force to audit people he called "global high wealth individuals.


There is little doubt that a lot of the estimated money held by wealthy Americans and their international criminal associates  in Caribbean,Bermuda,Lichtenstein,Israel,and even Swiss and UK etc., 'offshore' accounts are the result of financial fraud against the American public who have been conned into a never ending 'war on terror' that began when our own government and Israel and other international war criminals murdered 3000 people in New York on 9/11/01.
I emphasize the 'country' or money laundering haven of Israel that cynically hosted an 'anti-money laundering'  meeting of international money launderers a short while back because many of the offshore accounts that have used U.S.'public' companies better known as 'penny stocks' for decades  to defraud Americans and simultaneously use these fraudulent shells for corporate sabotage and - yes - terrorism within and without the United States are not only Israelis but Isreali government agents!One of the best but certainly not sole examples of this is the Israeli government's own  Shin Bet operation ICTS International that colluded with Israel's El Al Airlines to take control of Huntleigh private securitiy services that held the contract for Logan Airport Boston on 9/11 where according to the U.S. AND THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENTS' OWN OFFICIAL STORY THE TWO PLANES,FLIGHTS 11 AND 175,THAT HIT THE WTC IN NYC ORIGINATED FROM !The quote below is from Canadian-Israeli Barry Chamish who has substantiated both Christopher Bolyn's as while as my contention and the contention of anyone who has given the smallest effort to investigate,that not only scum like Carl Levin Zionist mass nurderer from Michigan and apparently Democratic Senator fore lifer but Dick Cheney and W Bush and the whole gang of war criminals in charge of the U.S.government on 9/11/01 as well as Israeli government sickos and NATO itself that includes European politicians and military fascist as well as their Islamo fascist allies of Kuwait and it Marvin Bush connected Securacom stock fraud and cotporate sabotage operation in chare of security at the WTC along with the Zionists of  Kroll were intrusted with 'security' at the WTC.

Note that both hedge fund money launderer Douglas Shulman and Mary Schapiro are white people whose Jewish parents and co-religionists  lied to them from childhood about being 'Semites' and that their ancestors originated in Palestine -complete lies ! And as you can see below before Bill Parish's open letter to both of them,they did indeed self enrich themselves as members of FINRA the former NASD whose legal name and legal by laws no doubt they changed to convenience themselves and their Jewish and Zionist brethren and money launderers,before selling over 20% to the Sheik Mohamed Al Rahid bin Maktoum even knowing or BECAUSE he colluded in allowing money to be sent to Saudi 9/11 suspects training at Jeb Bush's pal Wally Hilliard terrorist and drug trafficking flight school at Huffman Aviation in Venice,Florida which was known for its CIA and drug trafficking history long before that !
 YOU CAN NOTE BY NAMES OF THOSE WHO OFFICIALLY REPRESENT NASDAQ THAT THE JEWISH-ZIONIST CONTROL OF NASDAQ IS STILL IN FORCE ONLY IT IS NOW GREATLY LOCATED OFFSHORE TO MAKE POLICING BY AMERICANS DEFRAUDED MUCH MORE DIFFICULT THANKS TO BARACK OBAMA'S SEC Chair Mary Schapiro and W Bush and Obama's IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman..Mary Schapiro's intimate ties to Israeli money launderer Bernie Madoff as only one example as well as Douglas Shulman's connections to offshore hedge fund money laundereres as well as being one himself is outrageous ! The fact they both profited by selectively selling the former American based NASDAQ to Sheik Mohamed Al Rashid bin Maktoum the dictator of the Dubai money laundering state that allowed over $100,000 to be sent to Mohamed Atta at the Huffman Aviation flight school  in Venice,Florida pre 9/11 IS PROOF THAT IN THE POSITIONS THEY HOLD THEY ARE NOT ONLY DANGEROUS TO AMERICANS POCKET BOOKS BUT TO AMERICANS' LIVES. 

Finra execs got $11.6M in 2009 amid pay criticism - InvestmentNews
Oct 4, 2010 – S&P 500. 1356.78. 22.02 (1.65%). Nasdaq. 2908.47. 42.28 (1.48%) ... to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and Douglas Shulman, who left ... Former CEO Mary Schapiro, now SEC chairman, received the biggest ...


This with link is from one of  several articles I have written over the years re the corrupt hedge fund penny stock sheister Douglas Shulman who has headed W Bush's and now Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro's 
IRS to the detriment of all honest taxpaying Americans and those defrauded by offshore hedge funds and stock frauds he has participated in and profited from over the years.:

  9/11:U.S.IRS,SEC,AG Mukasey,Homeland Security Michael Chertoff,Israeli ICTS International Fraud
Who within the U.S. IRS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TERMINATING AN INVESTIGATION INTO TAX EVASION BY THE CRIMINALS OF ICTS INTERATIONAL !? ? ICTS evecutive Menachem Atzmon was even convicted in his own country of Israel for the equivalent of money laundering between Israeli government accounts Ariel Sharon's and his own Likud Party.And then the U.S. government allowed him and his far right Israeli partners to enter the U.S. and set up a stock 'securities' scam on the NASDAQ that defrauded American investors in order to buy Huntleigh airport rent-a-cops corp that conveniently had the contract to guard Boston's Logan Airport PRE 9/11 ! And I presume you know the results of that fiasco !..

IRS' Commissioner Douglas Shulman,friend to offshore tax avoidence,stock fraud money laundering
IRS Candidate Emerges
November 2, 2007
WASHINGTON -- A top executive with a nongovernmental regulator of U.S. securities firms has emerged as a leading candidate to head the Internal Revenue Service.
What a joke.It is a penny stock fraud aider and abettor,Douglas Shulman, and no doubt porofiteer of this criminal enterprise of using worthless U.S. penny stocks and offshore accounts to manipulate them from and send U.S. citizens assetts to anonymous offshore accounts - they have worse odds with U.S. penny stocks than gambling slots in Las Vegas and W Bush's U.S. IRS Commissioner knows this - cause he'sa in the business ! Just note his past 'job' experience as 'a vice president at private equity firm Darby Overseas Investments Ltd.',for instance ! The IRS Commissioner's job has been offshore accounts in low tax haven and corrupt money laundering islands and nations !
U.S. penny stock criminals are his colleagues !And W Bush appoints him as head of the U.S. IRS to aid the Bush regimes offshore money laundering sponsers who are the same as Douglas Shulman anonymous criminal offshore clients !In other words the boys from Israel running offshore money laundering with U.S. penny stock ops and pumps and dumps such as
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's pals at ICTS International who expect Shulman to give them a $2 million + tax refund on money they stole in the OTCBB penny stock fraud market that Shulman has also pretended(lied)to 'regulate' - certainly have a friend in the fellow insider to international U.S. penny stock fraud with Shulman as head of the IRS !
SO NOTE the very very head of the IRS Commissioner Shulman who should have the greatest incentive in regulating offshore accounts IS A PERSON WHOSE VERY CORRUPT U.S. PENNY STOCK CONNECTIONS PUT HIM AT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO PERFORM HIS IRS RESPONSIBILITIES !It is his clients very offshore accounts in the Caymans,Bermuda, Lichtenstein, Israel, Ise of Man and around the world that should be searched for unpàid taxes !
Believe me it is a bad nightmarish joke that offshore PROMOTING scum like Shuman have now taken over the IRS.
IRS Candidate Emerges
November 2, 2007
WASHINGTON -- A top executive with a nongovernmental regulator of U.S. securities firms has emerged as a leading candidate to head the Internal Revenue Service.
Douglas Shulman, 40 years old, vice chairman of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, is under strong consideration to be named IRS commissioner, according to a person familiar with the situation.
The IRS has been without a permanent commissioner since April, when Commissioner Mark Everson resigned to become president and chief executive officer of the American Red Cross. Linda Stiff, a senior IRS official who headed operations support, is serving as acting commissioner.
Mr. Shulman is the former chief of staff for the National Commission on Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service, a bipartisan commission appointed in the mid-1990s to study problems at the IRS such as its outdated computer system. He was cofounder and executive vice president of FoundryOne Inc., a technology investment firm. Before that, he served as a vice president at private equity firm Darby Overseas Investments Ltd.
Mr. Shulman's candidacy was reported first by the Washington Post yesterday.
An aide to Shulman declined comment.
White House spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore also declined comment but said, "We're looking forward to announcing the nominee as soon as possible."
Douglas Shulman
Vice Chairman
Douglas Shulman is Vice Chairman of FINRA, where he has broad responsibility for strategy, services and operations. He oversees the organization's technology, registration and disclosure, and industry testing and continuing education. He also is responsible for FINRA's market transparency facilities (OTCBB, TRACE, TRFs and ADF). He leads FINRA's strategic planning and international efforts. Mr. Shulman also has broad-based responsibilities for working with FINRA's membership to ensure effective firm input into FINRA's activities, and oversees FINRA's compliance services and member relations departments.


9/11:U.S.-Israeli Dept. Of In-Justice.IRS,ICTS International Fascists Vs.Wesley Snipes
Tony Ryals, 17.02.2008 23:06

Maybe the IRS fears the Israeli boys of ICTS International may become distracted or stressed again themselves if they aren't allowed to run their U.S. penny stock frauds unmolested on American taxpayers - and perhaps one of the next flights they are in charge of may 'accidentally' crash into the IRS building. Whereas with black actor Wesley Snipes - they can handle him - and make an example of him while those reponsible for 9/11 and major fraud against U.S. CITIZENS GET A ' FREE PASS'. Israeli Prime Minister Olmert should be required to order his boys to stand down or else !,0,50...

These scumbags (ICTS International)even tried unsuccessfully to scam $2 million from the U.S. IRS ! In fact any money these criminals and in my opinion suspects in the 9/11 disaster that in the end has costs America perhaps trillions of dollars - has come from defrauding Americans and thus decreasing the tax base and taxable income in America ! I know for a fact I was paying taxes on income till I lost the capital that accrued interest to criminals with offshore accounts in the Caymans or Bermuda or Kuala Lumpur or Dubai or Israel to U.S. PENNY STOCK CRIMINALS SUCH AS MR.ATZMON AND HIS ISRAELI MAFIA ! The U.S. IRS AND TTHE U.S. SEC CAN CONFIRM THAT IF THEY WISH ! They shouldeven be able to tell me where and to whom my money went - IF THEY WISH !

Before writing the above  I had not read this:

ICTS International N.V.: IRS Withdraws Criminal Investigation
Business Wire News ReleasesPublished: 01/14/08 04:03 PM ESTReleased By:
ICTS International N.V.
Related Stocks:
ICTS International N.V. (ICTSF. OB), a leading provider of advanced security services, is pleased to report that it has been advised that the Internal Revenue Service has withdrawn the criminal investigation. Mr. Menachem Atzmon, the Chairman of the Supervisory Board of ICTS, stated that, "I am pleased that at last we have been vindicated that we have not done anything wrong. The Company will now take all necessary steps to recover the $2.5 million refund claim that the Company is entitled to. The Company is moving forward in all fronts and we are very optimistic as to the future." .......

However the racist Israelis in control of the IRS can take the time to harrass a struggling black American actor of what amounts to chump change compared to the amount Menachem Atzmon the or Israeli Shin Bet government terrorists of ICTS International stole from American investors  while at the same time being the cause of 9/11 WTC tragedy and mass murder according to the U.S.government itself by allowing flights 11 and 175 to leave from Logan Airport on 9/11/01 with Mohamed Atta and the alledged Saudi Arabian terrorists on board enroute to their collision with the WTC in NYC !:

Feds: Wesley Snipes played role of tough guy versus IRS
Stephen Hudak | Sentinel Staff Writer
January 25, 2008
OCALA - Film star Wesley Snipes responded to his tax-evasion indictment in 2006 with a 29-page letter to the Internal Revenue Service that was filled with anti-tax rhetoric and warned that agents could face "collateral risk" for hounding him, according to key testimony in the government's case Thursday.
But defense lawyer Robert Barnes downplayed the actor's opus, which included 600 pages of supporting documents.
Snipes, a graduate of Jones High School, is charged with conspiracy to defraud, filing a fraudulent claim and six counts of willfully failing to file federal income-tax returns..
He remained cheerful Thursday, emerging from the courthouse and pausing briefly to smile for pictures and sign autographs

April 24, 2008 -- Updated 0053 GMT (0853 HKT)
Snipes gets the max -- 3 years -- in tax case
OCALA, Florida (CNN) -- Actor Wesley Snipes was sentenced Thursday to three years in prison for three misdemeanor counts of failing to file tax returns -- the maximum requested by federal prosecutors.
"Snipes' long prison sentence should send a loud and crystal clear message to all tax defiers that if they engage in similar tax defier conduct, they face joining him," said Assistant Attorney General Nathan J. Hochman of the Justice Department's Tax Division.
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Douglas Shulman said the law is clear on taxes.
"There is no secret formula that eliminates a person's tax obligations, nor are there any special exceptions," he said.
"The majority of Americans pay their taxes timely and accurately. Those who willfully violate the law must be held accountable."
In a civil suit, the IRS is seeking repayment of all taxes and interest from Snipes.
Federal prosecutors said the actor for nearly a decade escaped paying more than $15 million in income tax returns by sending money to overseas accounts, though they acknowledged in court that the amount is in dispute.

 Before the sentencing, the actor asked the court to show mercy and offered three checks totaling $5 million as a gesture of good will.
Federal prosecutors diverted the checks to the U.S. Treasury -- which accepted the payment -- but it wasn't enough.
"It's essentially a down payment, but a fraction of what he owes," said Assistant U.S. Attorney Scotland Morris.
Snipes' attorneys -- who had argued he should get probation or house arrest -- said they will appeal the sentence.


The above treatmwent of Amewrican  Leslie Snipes  is outrageous in light of the Swiss and other offshore bank accounts that IRS Commisioner Douglas Shulman has protected for his cronies who are all involved in stock frauds and often corporate sabotage against America itself of which the Israeli terrorists of ICTS International whose 'incompetence' at best took the lives of 3000 Americans, followed by many more in Iraq and Afghanistan,is an outstanding example


Friday, July 20, 2012

Mitt Romney's ties to IRS Commissioner

How can anyone have $100 million in an IRA account? Wouldn't that raise a red flag? Was Mitt Romney ever audited by the IRS?

Doug Shulman has been the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service from 2008 under George W. Bush until the present. He was named as one of 100 of the most influential people by Accounting Today.

Like Mitt Romney, Commissioner Shulman is also very much a "private equity" guy. Shulman began his career at the global investment consulting firm of A.T. Kearney from 1996 to 1997 in their New York City office. A.T. Kearneywas a direct competitor of Mitt Romney's Bain Capital.
(It's also worth noting that Doug Shulman and Mitt Romney are also both Harvard alumni)
Doug Shulman was the vice president of Darby Overseas Investments Ltd. (a limited liability corporation) from 1998-2000 where he managed financial and legal aspects of the company’s transactions for the holding company and general partner of several private investment funds.

In 2000, Shulman founded his own private equity consulting firm, FoundryOne Inc., which specialized in new business ventures in technology.

Shulman was the executive vice president of the National Association of Securities Dealers from 2001-2007. The NASD, a "self-regulatory" organization of the securities industry, is responsible for the operation and regulation of the Nasdaq stock market and over-the-counter markets. It also administrated exams for investment professionals, such as the Series 7 Exam. All individuals seeking to become a stockbroker must take the General Securities Representative Exam, commonly referred to as the Series 7 or Stockbroker Exam.

Shulman was also the vice chairman of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA, successor to NASD), the parent organization of NASD Regulation, The American Stock Exchange, NASD Dispute Resolution and The Nasdaq Stock Market (overseeing Bernie Madoff)

Shulman also sat on the board at the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC). He is a very well-connected man. DTCC was established in 1999 as a holding company to combine The Depository Trust Company (DTC) and National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC). It was set up to provide an "efficient and safe" way for buyers and sellers of securities to make their exchange, and thus "clear and settle" transactions.
The DTCC was formed just after The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1999. It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, opening up the market among banking companies (i.e. Goldman Sachs), securities companies (i.e Enron) and insurance companies (i.e. AIG). The Glass–Steagall Act had prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company.
The full Senate confirmed Doug Shulman to lead the IRS in March 2008. He said he doesn’t intend to stay in the job after his five-year term expires in November

Mitt Romney (also a "private equity" guy) has $100 million in an IRA account. Was Doug Shulman ever audited by the IRS before becoming its commissioner? Did Shulman also have Swiss bank accounts? He would certainly have a lot of knowledge on the subject.

Was there ever a time when Doug Shulman and Mitt Romney ever crossed paths? After all, don't they know their competitors?

The shadowy underworld of the private equity market has been grossly under-regulated and wrought with fraud and Ponzi schemes for a long time. Big accounting firms staffed with the best tax attorneys that money can buy, governed by nobody but a tax commissioner who has also made a career in private equity.

I'm not accusing anybody of anything, I'm just asking. (Google "Bud Meyers Tax Evasion")
>>> The 99% Cheer as 50% of the 1% to be Tried for Tax Evasion
Other "private equity" guys:
  • Bernie Madoff holds the world-record for biggest Ponzi scheme in history. Madoff stole billions while chairing the Nasdaq and maintaining cushy relationships at the SEC. He received the maximum sentence of 150 years in prison.
  • Joseph P. Nacchio - The CEO of Qwest Communications International. He was convicted of 19 counts of insider trading in Qwest stock and was sentenced to six years in federal prison
  • Kenneth Lay and Jeffery Skilling -- Enron -- Total Scammed: $74 Billion.
  • Thomas Joseph Petters - The former CEO and chairman of Petters Group Worldwide and convicted for turning his company into a $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme. He received a 50 year federal prison sentence.
  • Raffaello Follieri was accused of misappropriating a $50 million investment from billionaire Ronald Burkle meant to buy up Roman Catholic churches. Bishop Joseph Anthony Galante was implicated in the scandal.
  • Dr. Gerald Barnbaum - Medicaid fraud, mail fraud, identity theft, sexual battery, medical malpractice and second-degree murder.
  • Eugene Plotkin and David Pajcin, both formerly of Goldman Sachs, were the masterminds behind a complex Wall Street con and a scam using strippers to solicit information from Wall Street bankers.
  • Richard Scrushy - He was once the superstar CEO of HealthSouth, a huge provider of outpatient rehab services until federal prosecutors accused him of masterminding a $2.7 billion fraud.
  • Samuel Israel III turns his wall street hedge fund, "Bayou Investments", into a Ponzi scheme after poor management, then attempts a fake suicide to flee prosecution.
  • Dennis Kozlowski - He was once described as "The Most Aggressive CEO in America," now sits behind bars. A poster boy of excess, the former CEO of Tyco stole millions from his company, using the money for a lavish party, a gilded shower curtain and expensive art.
  • Anthony Elgindy - "The Mad Max of Wall Street" - The founder of Pacific Equity Investigations was a short seller who made millions in a trading scam using government secrets.
  • Lou Pearlman - The manager of bands like *NSYNC and The Backstreet Boys and masterminded scams of $500 million from investors in the longest running Ponzi scheme.
  • Al Parish - An economics professor and a trusted financial advisor was sentenced to federal prison after pleading guilty to financial fraud. Nearly 600 people lost up to $90 million invested in Parish Economic's private investment "pools."
  • Sholam Weiss - He helps fix the National Heritage Life Insurance's gaping $35 million accounting hole, and ends up partnering up with them - and bilking customers out of $500 million. He was sentenced to 845 years in prison.
  • Robert W. McLean - An investment manager and arts patron who traveled by limousine and ran a Ponzi scheme that had siphoned tens of millions of dollars from close friends and business associates. He eventually killed himself.
  • Stephen Trantel was once a Wall Street insider, a broker making hundreds of thousands of dollars in the Manhattan trading pits. After becoming unemployed, he started robbing banks.
  • Nancy Kissel murders her husband Robert Kissel, who had been a vice president in Goldman Sachs' Asian special situations group. His brother, Andrew Kissel, who had been accused of defrauding a New York co-op board of millions of dollars, was found murdered at his rented Greenwich, Connecticut estate.
  • Troy Titus - A disbarred and disgraced attorney who was sentenced to 30 years in federal prison for defrauding clients and friends out of more than $8 million in Ponzi scheme.
  • Alberto Vilar - An investor who was known as "a patron of opera". He was tried and convicted in November 2008 on charges of money laundering, investment advisor fraud, securities fraud, wire fraud and mail fraud, and was sentenced in February 2010 to nine years in prison.
  • Danny Pang - He was the CEO of Private Equity Management Group who ran a Ponzi scheme and made millions betting on when people will die. His wife, ex-stripper Janie Louise Pang, was murdered in the Villa Park house, possibly by a contract killer, after she took steps toward a divorce. He has also since died. Wall Street Journal
  • Marc Harris promised financial freedom to people with off-shore bank accounts as a way to keep assets out of the reach of government. But the "guru" was running a Ponzi scheme and bilking clients out of millions of dollars.
  • Greater Ministries International - A story of religious fraud and a $500 million dollar pyramid scheme.
  • Robert Allen Stanford - He was the chairman of the now defunct Stanford Financial Group and was a sponsor of professional sports - - now accused of a massive Ponzi scheme.
  • Larry Salander - One of the biggest names in New York’s art world (Salander-O’Reilly Galleries), but collectors see red when he swipes more than $100 million from their pockets.
  • Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin - The former CEO of Agriprocessors, now-bankrupt slaughterhouse and meat packing plant. He was convicted of 86 counts of financial fraud, including bank fraud, mail and wire fraud and money laundering. In June 2010, he was sentenced to 27 years in prison.
  • William “Boots” Del Biaggio III - A venture capitalist and former co-owner of the hockey team San Jose Sharks. He was sentenced to eight years in prison and more than $67.4 million in restitution for misappropriating funds from individual investors he advised.
  • Scott W. Rothstein - A disbarred lawyer and the former managing shareholder, chairman, and chief executive officer of the now-defunct Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm. He was accused of funding a massive 1.2 billion dollar Ponzi scheme.
  • John Bennett - His Foundation for New Era Philanthropy operated a notorious Ponzi scheme. After having raised over $500 million from 1100 donors, he embezzled $135 million.
  • Martin Frankel - A financier and con-man who vanished with $200 million dollars. A story of money laundering, prostitution, bizarre sex and drug abuse.
  • Eric Stein - Masterminded one of the largest Ponzi schemes in Nevada history, cost his victims nearly $34 million.
  • Reverend Abraham Kennard - As many as 1600 churches nationwide are swindled out of $10 million.
  • Reed Eliot Slatkin - An ordained Scientology minister and co-founder of EarthLink was the perpetrator of one of the largest Ponzi schemes in the United States since Charles Ponzi himself.
  • Robert Ray Courtney - A former pharmacist who owned and operated Research Medical Tower Pharmacy. He was convicted of pharmaceutical fraud and sentenced to federal prison.
  • Bernard Ebbers - The CEO of WorldCom becomes the poster child for everything that went wrong on Wall Street in the 1990s. WorldCom's eventual downfall shakes the financial community and the lives of thousands of investors.
  • Stefan Wilson - Operated a fraudulent investment fund. His Ponzi scheme took almost $13 million from over 50 investors and landed him 20 years in prison.
  • Marc Dreier is a high-powered lawyer with celebrity clients. But Dreier is a conman and steals more than $700 million from hedge funds.
  • Arthur Nadel - Manages the hedge fund Scoop Management Co, a $350 million fund. In the blink of an eye, he disappears and leaves clients without their life savings.
  • Joseph Medawar - A television producer runs a scam to rob investors out of millions of dollars.
  • Barton Harry Watson - One the chairman of Cybernet, a wildly successful global technology company, he stood accused of stealing millions in an elaborate fraud.
  • Dana Giacchetto - Advised Hollywood's hottest stars (from Leonardo diCaprio to Ben Affleck) But his star-power faded when nearly $10 million goes missing, for which he spent 5 years in prison.
  • Alfred Taubman - A wealthy art collector and the former chairman of Sotheby's who is now a convicted felon for the price-fixing scandal at Christie's and Sotheby's.
  • Nevin Shapiro - A University of Miami football booster who is currently imprisoned for orchestrating a $930 million Ponzi scheme. He even purchased a yacht on which sex parties with prostitutes were held.
  • Kenneth Starr - An accountant to stars like Sylvester Stallone, Diane Sawyer, and Wesley Snipes, but mismanages his clients’ money, pockets millions, and then he marries an exotic dancer. But then later he gets more than seven years behind bars for a multimillion-dollar investment scheme.
Doug Shulman's Education:
Georgetown University Law Center, JD
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University, MPA (Mitt Romney also went to Harvard)
Williams College, BA.



JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel's Ehud Olmert was acquitted of major corruption charges on Tuesday but convicted of breach of trust, a lesser offence, in what was widely seen as a stunning victory for the former prime minister.This was not Olmert's first escape from fraud charges leaving others to shoulder the blame. In the late '80s, Olmert committed mass fraud as co-Treasurer of the Likud Party. He was charged with the crime but only his partner, Menachem Atzmon, sat in prison for over three years. Olmert, apparently, paid his partner in crime well for taking the rap, the consequences of which led to 9-11. Menachem Atzmon, former partner of Ehud Olmert as Likud Co-Treasurer, convicted in Israel in 1996 for campaign finance fraud, took over management of security at the Boston and Newark airports when their company ICTS bought Huntleigh USA in 1999. UAL Flight 175 and AA 11, which struck the twin towers, both originated in Boston, while UAL 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, departed from the Newark airport. This convicted Likud criminal's firm was in charge of security at Logan Airport inspecting the validity of passports and visas, searching cargo, screening passengers when two airliners were hijacked from there on Sept. 11, 2001, and demolished the World Trade Center towers in New York. Without Atzmon in charge of Newark and Logan Airports, 9-11 could NOT HAVE HAPPENED.

Diagram 3. Network of Jewish individuals and Jewish run companies
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
11 Sep 2001 – companies connected to security at the World Trade Center on 9/11/01. ... A.I.G.. A large insurance company. It purchased. 23% of Kroll, Inc in ...

The Israeli Role in the Plundering of Iceland - The Truthseeker
20 May 2010 – Evidently, Kroll continued to manage security for the WTC complex from ... Later, Maurice Greenberg's fraudulent insurance company A.I.G. was ...

9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush
Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United ...


Super rich hold $32 trillion in offshore havens

LONDON | Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:02am EDT

(Reuters) - Rich individuals and their families have as much as $32 trillion of hidden financial assets in offshore tax havens, representing up to $280 billion in lost income tax revenues, according to research published on Sunday.
The study estimating the extent of global private financial wealth held in offshore accounts - excluding non-financial assets such as real estate, gold, yachts and racehorses - puts the sum at between $21 and $32 trillion.
The research was carried out for pressure group Tax Justice Network, which campaigns against tax havens, by James Henry, former chief economist at consultants McKinsey & Co.
He used data from the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, United Nations and central banks.
The report also highlights the impact on the balance sheets of 139 developing countries of money held in tax havens by private elites, putting wealth beyond the reach of local tax authorities.
The research estimates that since the 1970s, the richest citizens of these 139 countries had amassed $7.3 to $9.3 trillion of "unrecorded offshore wealth" by 2010.
Private wealth held offshore represents "a huge black hole in the world economy," Henry said in a statement.
(Reporting by Chris Vellacott)


You can be sure not only Mary Schapiro knolws Bernie Madoff who was really one of her mentors in corruption and fraud against the American public but also Douglas Shulman  must surely be a colleague of
Israeli money lñaunderer Bernie Madoff as well.Note as I emphasized above

  1. 'There's Something About Mary' as Madoff Calls Schapiro “a Dear ...
    30 Oct 2009 – Did FINRA invest its own funds from its internal investment portfolio with Bernie Madoff? Would FINRA's head Mary Schapiro invest with her ...
  2. Bernie Madoff And Mary Schapiro Relationship | Sense on Cents
    19 Oct 2009 – Posts Tagged 'Bernie Madoff and Mary Schapiro relationship'. Attorney Richard Greenfield Brands Mary Schapiro and FINRA Execs as “Liars” ...
  3. Mary Schapiro's Tenure At FINRA | Sense on Cents
    Great American Ed Morrow Lashes Out at Mary Schapiro .... FINRA largely reduces the extensive relationships between Bernie Madoff and family members with ...
  4. Mary Schapiro | TPMMuckraker
    23 Apr 2010 – TPMMuckraker Mary Schapiro. ... And as we noted last week, Finra, under Schapiro, failed to catch Bernard Madoff's alleged "$50 billion ponzi ...
  5. Bernard Madoff 'fraud': Obama to appoint Mary Schapiro as new ... › FinanceFinance TopicsBernard Madoff
    18 Dec 2008 – Bernard Madoff 'fraud': Obama to appoint Mary Schapiro as new chairman of ... Mary Schapiro, chief executive of Finra – the Financial Industry ...
  6. Is FINRA's Future in Doubt?
    23 Feb 2010 – Mary Schapiro alone received over $3 million, in addition to a ... On information and belief, (1) Bernard Madoff joined NASD's Board of ...
     Even an internal review conducted by FINRA itself found that the organization missed several key opportunities to investigate the securities fraud by R. Allen Stanford. And while FINRA officials have denied any wrongdoing in the failure to detect Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, securities law scholar John Coffee testified before Congress that “Madoff’s brokerage business was by definition within…FINRA’s jurisdiction.”
    An investigation by The Wall Street Journal further confirmed that FINRA and its predecessor NASD, under the leadership of current SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, had a decidedly light touch when it came to regulation and enforcement, with significant declines in disciplinary fines assessed, individuals barred, and firms expelled during her time at the organization.
    Outrageous Executive Compensation Packages
    Despite its countless failures, FINRA’s board has approved outrageous compensation packages for the organization’s senior executives. Tax documents show that in 2008–a year in which FINRA also lost $568 million in its investment portfolio–the organization’s 20 senior executives received nearly $30 million in salaries and bonuses. Mary Schapiro alone received over $3 million, in addition to a lump-sum departing payment worth $7.2 million. FINRA’s decision to reward its senior leadership with seven-figure salaries and bonuses–at a time when many of its larger member firms were getting away with securities violations that brought our financial markets to the brink of collapse–ought to raise serious concerns about granting the organization any additional regulatory authority.
    Failure to Warn the Public about Auction Rate Securities
    In its 2008 annual report, FINRA described the recent collapse of the auction rate securities (ARS) market:
    Auction Rate Securities (ARS) traditionally had been a valuable source of market liquidity, targeted at investors seeking a cash-like investment that paid a higher yield than money market mutual funds or certificates of deposit. But in February 2008, the ARS market froze, leaving some investors unable to access their holdings. The episode prompted an investigation by FINRA that revealed some firms had sold these securities using advertising, marketing materials or other internal communications with its sales force that were not fair and balanced and therefore did not provide a sound basis for investors to evaluate the benefits and risks of purchasing ARS.
    Of course, the report omits any mention of the fact that NASD (FINRA’s predecessor) had liquidated its own $647 million ARS investment in 2007 without giving any warning to other investors, who now have tens of billions of dollars stuck in the ARS market. In fact, NASD knew well before then that ARS shouldn’t be treated like cash or cash equivalents, explaining in its 2003, 2004, and 2005 annual reports that it was classifying its own auction rate securities as available-for-sale investments. Yet FINRA neglected to warn the investing public about the risks posed by ARS investments until it was far too late. Congress should at least investigate the circumstances surrounding NASD’s liquidation of its ARS investment before deciding to grant FINRA any additional authority to “protect” investors.
    Incestuous Relationship Between FINRA and the Securities Industry
    FINRA’s numerous failures should hardly come as a surprise given the incestuous relationship between SROs and the financial services industry. It has been said that the close connection with industry allows self-regulators to respond to industry malfeasance more rapidly than a public entity. However, POGO believes that the cozy relationship between SROs and industry is a major reason why entities such as FINRA have failed to operate as effective regulators.
    For instance, Amerivet’s complaint against FINRA points to several connections between NASD and the Madoff family:
    On information and belief, (1) Bernard Madoff joined NASD’s Board of Governors in January 1984 and served as Vice Chairman while his Ponzi scheme was well underway, (2) he had previously held a number of NASD committee assignments since the 1970s and was instrumental in the development of NASDAQ, (3) he also headed NASDAQ, (4) his brother, Peter Madoff, served as Vice Chairman of the NASD, (5) Mary Schapiro, former FINRA CEO, appointed Mark Madoff, one of Bernard Madoff’s sons, to the National Adjudicatory Council, a regulatory body that reviews disciplinary decisions made by FINRA, and (6) Bernard Madoff’s niece, Shana Madoff, a “Compliance Officer” of Madoff until the firm’s collapse, was a member of a compliance advisory committee of FINRA.
    There were also close connections between FINRA and Stanford Financial Group: Lena Stinson, director of global compliance at Stanford, served on FINRA’s membership committee, while Frederick Fram, chief operating officer of Stanford Group Holdings, served on FINRA’s continuing education committee.
    And it appears the financial crisis did nothing to weaken the close ties between FINRA and the securities industry. Even a cursory examination of FINRA’s current leadership paints a clear picture of a regulator that is still captured by the industry it is tasked with regulating. Richard Ketchum is a former General Counsel for the Corporate and Investment Bank at Citigroup, Inc. Robert Errico, FINRA’s Executive Vice President for Member Regulation, is a former Senior Vice President for Capitals Market Oversight at Charles Schwab & Co., and a former General Counsel for Schwab Capital Markets L.P. Susan Merrill, FINRA’s Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement, is a former partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell, which represents some of the largest financial institutions in the world. And on FINRA’s Board of Governors, many of the members that are supposed to represent the public’s interest have close ties to the securities industry. Given that SROs such as FINRA are supposed to be the front line overseers for many financial products, POGO believes that the cozy relationships built into this system create a serious conflict of interest.
    Investors and Taxpayers Forced to Foot the Bill
    In an apparent attempt to sell the idea that FINRA should have more supervisory authority, Richard Ketchum told Congress that “the increased manpower and enhanced investor protection would come at no cost to the taxpayer” because SROs are funded exclusively by the entities they regulate. Unfortunately, this funding system amounts to a user tax on investors in the form of transaction costs. And, of course, taxpayers must foot the bill for the SEC’s oversight of FINRA and other self-regulators, which entails approving SRO rules, monitoring their activities, hearing internal appeals, and overseeing board activities...............

  7. SEC Chief Mary Schapiro Faces Criticism For Madoff-Related Hire
    9 Mar 2011 – SEC Chief Mary Schapiro Faces Criticism For Madoff-Related Hire. Mary Schapiro ... Securities And Exchange Commission · Bernie Madoff ...

Letter to Douglas Shulman

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
0 puntos on reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

May 22, 2009
  Via Telecopier and Federal Express 
The Honorable Douglas Shulman
Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Department of Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Dear Commissioner Shulman:
            I do not know whether you are aware that in July of 2004, in the midst of Harry Markopolos’ revelations to the SEC that Bernard Madoff was operating a Ponzi scheme, the Internal Revenue Service placed its imprimatur on Madoff by approving his company as a non-bank custodian for IRAs.  I am writing to request that you inquire into, inform me, and make public how this happened.
            As you may know, when it enacted the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Congress was deeply concerned over the safety of citizens’ retirement savings.  It wished to insure that those who “participate in [retirement] plans actually receive benefits.”  To insure that Americans’ retirement monies were safeguarded, Congress put the IRS in charge of insuring that fiduciary standards were met by custodians of retirement plans, IRAs and similar monies. Congress felt the IRS had previously done well in overseeing fiduciary standards, and this experience would aid it in future.  To assist the IRS in doing this job in future, Congress authorized appropriations of 70 million dollars per year.
            Congress further provided that the IRS could authorize non banks to be the custodian of IRAs and similar accounts if the non bank provided “substantial evidence” that “the way in which he will administer” accounts will be “within accepted rules of fiduciary conduct with respect to the handling of other people’s money.” 
            To carry out Congress’ intent, the IRS has regulations requiring that, to be an approved non-bank custodian of IRAs, a company has to have a separate trust department; the assets of different accounts cannot be commingled; continuity of the company has to be insured by diversified ownership under which no one individual can own more than fifty percent of its shares; the company has to keep customers’ assets in a vault; and the company’s fiduciary records have to be kept separate from other records.  The IRS also ruled that, in order to carry out its function of safeguarding the owners of IRAs, pension funds and similar monies, it has a right to inspect the books and records of any company that wishes to become or already is an approved non-bank custodian.
            Despite Congress’ intent that it safeguard retirement monies, and despite its own regulations, in 2004 the IRS approved Madoff as a non-bank custodian of IRAs even though he was fraudulently stealing retirement monies from IRAs and even though he was in violation of the IRS’ own regulations.  Among the violations of the IRS’ regulations were these:  Madoff had no separate trust department.  One man, Bernard Madoff, owned 90 to 100 percent of the company rather than less than fifty percent.  (The Trustee, Irving Picard, has said in a complaint that Bernard Madoff’s company was “wholly owned” by him.)  There was no vault -- and an inspection would have shown there also were no securities to put in a vault.  All the customers’ assets were commingled since Madoff stole them all for his own use instead of keeping securities in separate accounts.  And had the IRS done its job, it also would have learned that, for at least fifteen years or so, Madoff had previously operated as a non-approved non-bank custodian for tens or scores of IRAs and as a non-approved non-bank subcustodian for hundreds of others.  These discoveries would have necessarily caused the IRS to uncover and blow the whistle on Madoff’s fraudulent conduct instead of approving him as a non-bank custodian of IRAs in 2004.
            The question which arises, of course, is how did this occur.  How did the IRS come to approve Madoff in 2004?  Did it conduct no investigation, but simply rubber stamp his application to be a non-bank custodian?  Were there bribes or other criminal conduct involved?  Was the IRS influenced somehow or other by the SEC.  It seems inconceivable that the IRS could have approved Madoff.  Yet it did.  How did this happen?
            As said, I request that you conduct an investigation of this, let me know the answer(s), and make the answer(s) public.  It is no trifling matter when the Internal Revenue Service seems to have abetted the largest fraud in history by approving Madoff to be a non-bank custodian of retirement monies.  It is no trifling matter when the IRS did this in violation of the intent of Congress and its own regulations.  Those who lost money, the Congress, and the entire country have a right to be told the answer(s) to the question of how did this awful thing happen.
                                                                                     Sincerely yours,  
                                                                                    Lawrence R. Velvel

Lawrence R. Velvel is a cofounder and the Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law, and is the founder of the American College of History and Legal Studies.
 Interesting 'coincidence' that investment advisor Bill Parish adressed his letter below regarding shoddy
or non existent cash flow statements to both SEC Chair Mary Schapiro who is an old  Bernie Madoff cronie who specialized in stealing American money and laundering it for the racist and religionist Israeli police and war state,as well as to her colleageue in hedge fund,(offshore),securities fraud who W Bush appointed as IRS Commissioner and who Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro in his 'wisdom' and Zionist corruption kept there.No wonder all those Swiss bank accounts he should have busted and whose stolen stock or securities fraud profits sgould have been repatriated to U.S. have remained protected.Mary Schapiro and Doug Shulman who further welf enriched themselves by selling the NASDAQ to the Sheik Mohamad Al Rashid
bin Maktoum of Dubai and his Zionist or Israeli bosses is just one more example of why people of the Jewish religion should NOT be allowed to dominate international and particularly U.S.finances as if we still lived in the Medieval European Dark Ages whern only Jews were allowed to perfoem usary or provide loans at interest.This nasty habit has also allowed them the cash to by our media as well and dominate our 'news' which has degenerated into pro Israel propaganda and brainwashing of the masses.
Note problems Bill Parish has had with NY Times 'reporters' who becasuse it bis owned by Zionists who lied about WMDS in Iraq and who also covered up Israelis involved in 9/11/01 led to the death of 3000 Americans in NY on 9/11 followed by hundreds of American troops dead and thousands injured for life !

** June 7, 2011 ** Letter to SEC Chair and IRS Commissioner – Tax Deduction Pyramid Scheme

The following letter was sent to SEC Chair Mary Schapiro and IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman on “tax day” with the hope they will jointly work at restoring the integrity of cash flow statements, without question the most important analytical tool for investment advisors like myself.  It is simply astonishing, given their material nature, that listed companies are not fully disclosing purchased and accumulated net operating losses nor the impact of complying with the “fractions rule” in the case of private equity partnerships.
Parish & Company
10260 S.W. Greenburg Rd., Suite 400
Portland, OR 97223
Tel:(503)643-6999 Fax:(503)293-3507

April 15, 2011
Mary Schapiro
Office of the Chairman
Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 1070
100 F Street NE
Washington, D.C. 20549

cc: Elise B. Walter – SEC Commissioner
Troy A. Parades – SEC Commissioner
Robert Khuzami – SEC Director
Doug Shulman – IRS Commissioner
Heather Maloy – IRS Commissioner Large Business Division
Walter Harris – IRS Director Financial Services
Elise Bean – Congressional Oversight Committee

Dear Chair Schapiro,
In 15 years as an investment advisor I have always done my best to support the SEC’s work, having led many key corporate governance related initiatives. Past Chairs Levitt, Pitt and Donaldson are all familiar with my work, which has also been reported in front page stories in leading publications including Bloomberg, the New York Times, Barrons and USA Today.
The purpose of this letter today is to alert you directly to an alarming trend with respect to the rapidly eroding integrity of cash flow statements filed with the commission. The culprit is non-disclosure of important tax related transactions involving material net operating losses, in addition to compensation and related expense allocations subject to the “fractions rule”and NOL loss limitation rules that are material to past, present and future cash flows involving publicly traded partnerships, such as Blackstone, in which tax exempt investors participate. The NOL related limitation issues are also a significant issue in mergers and buyouts of public companies.
Back in late 1999 when I provided original research to Gretchen Morgenson, David Cay Johnston and Floyd Norris of the NY Times regarding how Microsoft paid no federal income tax I was told that this was ridiculous. You discredit your excellent work by saying such a thing, Morgenson added. Six months later she did a front page story outlining the scheme involving the issuance of NQ stock options. Similarly Bob Herdman, Chief Operating Officer at the Commission, thought the idea ridiculous at first.
While everyone was focused on the future dilution of options, my focus was instead on the historic tax based cash flow impact of options. What made this original research possible was a cash flow statement that analyzed cash flow and, in conjunction with footnotes, provided a good general idea of tax related impacts.
More recently, since last summer, I have tried to get the NY Times to do a story on how major private equity and hedge funds may indeed be escaping taxation completely via gaming carried interest deductions in violation of two key IRS reforms established by former President Reagan, the “fractions rule”and limitations on purchased NOLs.
The Times chose to focus on publicly traded GE and in their story never fully highlighted how GE is using NOLs. How could the Times put their reputation on the line based upon my work without adequate SEC disclosure? Also interesting to note is that at one time over the last two years, one private equity firm, Harbinger, owned more than 10 percent of the NY Times. Similarly, per Yahoo finance, JP Morgan owns almost 10 percent of Gannett, parent to USA today.
Media consolidation and outright ownership of media by major financial institutions, including private equity and hedge funds that have bitterly fought to undermine both the SEC’s and IRS efforts, has complicated this task. Perhaps now is a good time for the SEC and IRS to be more vigilant and oriented at making news aimed at solving fundamental problems before they accumulate and lead to major market problems. While leading attorneys at major law firms representing the private equity crowd enjoy great access with top officials via conferences and other venues, independent advisors like myself with a distinguished record can barely get a phone call returned.
GE was low hanging “media fruit” so to speak. Clearly the much bigger issue is that involving the takeover of public companies by private equity and hedge funds, effectively converting these formerly tax paying entities to the equivalent of tax exempts using NQ option and carried interest schemes resulting in an NOL pyramid scheme. Again, the bulk of these NOLs were never cash expenses but simply NQ options and carried interest.
If these private equity and hedge funds were indeed catering only to affluent investors that would be fine yet today many of these organizations receive most of their funding from public pensions. I have written about this extensively over the last 5-7 years and pushed hard to get the concept behind carry fees fully understood and disclosed. Again, numerous examples of this work appear in major publications.
One of the big lessons of the era was the need for the SEC to collaborate more with the Federal Reserve and see the economic impact of accounting irregularities. Most notable of course back then were merger and stock option accounting related issues. Former San Francisco Fed President Robert Parry told me, look Bill, “accounting issues were not in the fed’s purview” in late 1999. This was when the market was more focused upon whether Alan Greenspan took a bath before a meeting of the Federal Reserve.
The key lesson in the recent crisis involving mortgage financing and related derivatives was of course that conflicts of interest with key regulators and rating agencies can lead to similarly disastrous results. If Moody’s had done their job, we would have had no crisis. Also germane was the impact of top government officials such as Robert Rubin moving to industry and aggressively attacking important safeguards, Glass-Steagall in his case.
The reason I have copied your former colleague at FINRA, current IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman, is that to date there has been almost no discussion regarding how tax policy played a major role in both crises and in my opinion, with the proposed repeal of the fractions rule, could ignite the next. My work in this area goes back to 1999.
My hope is that you will work together to restore integrity in what is clearly the most important disclosure of all for any public company, the cash flow statement and related footnotes. Doing so will also greatly enhance overall tax equity, in my judgement. The notion that major tax related impacts not be disclosed is a significant fraud upon all statement users and puts the whole system at risk.
More specifically, someone at the Treasury has proposed repealing the fractions rule in the 2012 revenue guidelines. To that, I only have the following thoughts: Robert Rubin/Glass-Steagall; Wendy Graham/Derivatives Deregulation. It is absolutely ridiculous when it was such an important reform and there has been almost no enforcement of it for years, perhaps not unlike mortgage underwriting standards. The industry failed in Congress and failed to get an American Bar Association sponsored revenue ruling ,yet now it the Treasury itself advocating the repeal of the fractions rule.
While some companies will argue rightfully that tax returns are private and not required to be disclosed, such material NOL and “fractions rule” related information must be disclosed when public firms are taken private or in the event of significant sales or mergers. This is fundamental accounting 101. Some would add that failure to do so is the very essence of fraud because it fuels the notion that investing is an insider’s game. What it also does is allow problems to accumulate and ultimately exacerbate major problems in the market.
These cash flow based disclosures are vital information to an SEC Registered advisor like myself, and other investors. And for the last couple of years I have found increasing frustration in dealing with leading journalists because they are simply not getting the mandatory public disclosure required to corroborate my research findings and forward key corporate governance initiatives.
A good recent example is the General Electric sale of NBC to Comcast. So why do these two completely independent firms get to “game the system” with respect to the allocation of net operating losses belonging to GE via a special allocation partnership, subsequent to a sale of the business? One might ask, is this a fraud upon taxpayers, investors, both or simply much ado about nothing? When I make such an observation to a leading journalist, they need to be able to see a footnote that confirms or refutes my claim. This is as basic as corroborating total revenues per the income statement.
It is understandable that many journalists have expressed no interest in covering the proposed repeal of the “fractions rule,”simply because they don’t understand it. The reason of course is that these public partnership firms are not providing adequate disclosure to the SEC. In addition, something appears very amiss at the Treasury department. Who is behind this repeal, really? If you do a search of Blackstone’s 10K you will find no references to the fractions rule, nor related financial adjustments made to confirm to it. Similarly, no one at the Internal Revenue Service is willing to discuss this. (See attached letter to Curt Wilson, Associate General Counsel Passthroughs at the IRS).
At you can also see a blogpost that features a brief audio, taken from an American Bar Association Conference in which one of the nations leading attorneys, Sanford Presant, explains how investors received $7 in tax deductions for each $1 invested prior to the fractions rule. Also included is a brief audio clip from a top IRS official, Curt Wilson, who volunteered to sit on a panel, noting he sees no enforcement issues with the “fractions rule.”
How can we transfer our angst over the fractions rule to you,”a King and Spaulding attorney asked the IRS’s Wilson? Wilson later told me that the fractions rule was not being considered for repeal yet it is now in the 2012 Revenue Guidelines for repeal. Wilson will not confirm who is involved in the repeal nor its specifics. Again, in my mind this will be the genesis of a crisis if not prevented, similar to the repeal of Glass-Steagall or the rules regarding derivatives trading.
Per my analysis, firms with inadequate cash flow disclosure to the commission with respect to NOL and fractions rule related considerations include, but are not limited to Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, General Electric, Comcast, Blackstone, KKR, TPG (via acquisitions including J Crew since TPG is not publicly traded), Apollo and Fortress.
For example, if Blackstone is going to purchase a publicly traded company and thereby assumes significant accumulated NOLs, those valuable NOLs must be disclosed fully to existing shareholders prior to a sale. In addition, the same partnership must disclose the impact of the fractions rule, specifically, how much of the deductions cannot be taken due to having tax exempt investors in the purchasing partnership. Such investors often represent more than 80 percent of all funds in major private equity partnerships.
Also relevant are the limitations on the deductibility of purchased NOLs, and whether they are being fully deducted using a reverse scheme, in which an entity with significant NOLs purchases a firm paying significant taxes, thereby escaping the required amortization reform put forth by Reagen. My original research identified this scheme in 2001 subsequent to the takeover of Time Warner by AOL.
It is not enough to say, we need not disclose such information since it is an item on our tax return. Full disclosure and materiality mandate such disclosure of material tax driven cash flow items directly on the cash flow statement or in the footnotes.
In another example, if TPG purchases J Crew and by doing so receives $1 billion in net operating losses, a large part of which are tax deductions created from stock options, how are these valuable net operating losses treated. These expenses never resulted in a cash outlay, and if the partnership at TPG buying J Crew has 80 percent tax exempt investors, are these NOLs being stripped away in violation of the fractions rule prior to being put in the partnership? And, if so, is this not a violation of the fractions rule resulting in a LILO like leasing doubling up of tax deductions for taxable general partners, etc?
One could argue such non-disclosure to the SEC is manufacturing a tax deduction pyramid or flipping scheme in which private equity firms take companies private, public, private again and then public. Each time creating staggering NOLs in the form of stock option or carried interest deductions, not resulting from an outlay of cash for equipment or wages, but rather a paper tax deduction pyramid scheme.
Regarding Blackstone, another potential issue includes the valuation of partnership interests that create valuable tax deductions? Are these straight up or are they the equivalent of a stock option back dating scheme being used that is aimed to increase tax deductions by awarding such units at artificially low strike prices, achieving the same impact as backdating? Of course tax exempt partners may not care, yet what of the future cash flow impact for public unit holders? In reviewing the history and Blackstone’s limited public disclosure, something just does not look right, in my opinion.
Furthermore, if Blackstone executives exchange unvested NQ options with Blackstone partnership units based upon carried interest, the strike price value difference between each should be fully disclosed to shareholders, not simply in aggregate.
In my original research on stock options back in 1999 I often noted this backdating impact and was simply amazed that at the time there was no concern. It was sad to see how this developed into a legal feed bucket for law firms that never acknowledged the most damaging part of the scheme, that being the creation of a tax deduction pyramid scheme.
In 2000, I arranged a related story on this for Gretchen Morgenson of the NY Times involving two employees at Microsoft who expressed an interest in becoming clients. I tentatively agreed to accept them as clients only if they were willing to discuss their situation with Morgenson given the important tax governance related involving their situation. Similarly, Morgenson agreed that, if she did the story, she would mention my simple idea regarding a pivotal tax reform.
The couple had exercised options but failed to sell shares to pay the tax until they filed their return several months later. The subsequent drop in Microsoft’s stock price left them with a large tax bill and insufficient assets to pay the tax. I had expected that the story, which appeared on the front page, would include my comment that the IRS provide a one-time adjustment in such situations, provided the total options were less than x in value. Unfortunately the comment did not appear yet it was however recognized as a key story with Morgenson being awarded the Pulitzer Prize.
My guess is that the Times advertisers, including Microsoft and Cisco Systems, did not want the story done because if employees were allowed to “look back” on a one time basis, this would clearly eliminate the tax deduction the companies were taking. More centrally, it would challenge the stability of this innovative tax deduction pyramid scheme that began with NQ options and has now morphed into carried interest.
Of course this is particularly germane if a CEO orchestrates the sale of a public company and stays on with the private equity firm as a shareholder. Perhaps Tony James, Blackstone’s president, put it best by saying,“Now we can just exchange the unvested portion of an executive’s NQ options with our partnerships units and not expend valuable cash in order to bring them on board and get the deal done.” You can see this summarized at in two blog posts. One is dated August 2010 and the second March 31, 2011. Both provide important background for this letter.
I spoke with Mark Zehner in your office about this issue last fall, specific to the fractions rule, and frankly must reflect significant disappointment at the lack of follow up, especially given the stellar work he did in the municipal finance area. This is not a UBTI driven issue unique to tax exempt investors in public partnerships but rather an assault on the basic integrity of“the key financial statement” used by advisors like myself to analyze the merits of a particular investment opportunity, the cash flow statement.
We all want the economy to turn around, yet in my opinion, that will only happen when integrity and confidence are restored to the cash flow statement. Doing so will allow numerous peripheral areas to self correct ranging from capital flows to overall tax equity.
Thank you for considering these thoughts and of course I will make myself available for follow up commentary. The opportunity to develop some level of dialogue with the commission would be much appreciated. This could include someone at the commission suggesting I be invited to speak at a major conference, etc.
Bill Parish
** Blog posts and related audio clips at